Convective initiation and storm life cycles in convection‐permitting simulations of the Met Office Unified Model over South Africa. (2nd April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Keat, William J.; Stein, Thorwald H. M.; Phaduli, Elelwani; Landman, Stephanie; Becker, Erik; Bopape, Mary‐Jane M.; Hanley, Kirsty E.; Lean, Humphrey W.; Webster, Stuart
• Is Part Of: Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Volume 145:Number 721(2019)
• Page Start: 1323
• Page End: 1336
• Publication Date: 2019-04-02
• Subjects: Africa -- convection‐permitting models -- convective initiation -- model evaluation -- radar observations -- storm life cycles; Meteorology -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/qj.3487
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0035-9009

Abstract

Abstract : Convective initiation is a challenge for convection‐permitting models due to its sensitivity to sub‐km processes. We evaluate the representation of convective storms and their initiation over South Africa during four summer months in Met Office Unified Model simulations at a 1.5‐km horizontal grid length. Storm size distributions from the model compare well with radar observations, but rainfall in the model is predominantly produced by large storms (50 km in diameter or larger) in the evening, whereas radar observations show that most rainfall occurs throughout the afternoon, from storms 10–50 km in diameter. In all months, the modelled maximum number of storm initiations occurs at least 2 hr prior to the radar‐observed maximum. However, the diurnal cycle of rainfall between the model and observations compares well, suggesting that the numerous storm initiations in the simulations do not produce much rainfall. Modelled storms are generally less intense than those in radar observations, especially in early summer. In February, when tropical influences dominate, the simulated storms are of similar intensity to observed storms. Simulated storms tend to reach their peak intensity in the first 15 min after initiation, then gradually become less intense as they grow. In radar observations, storms reach their peak intensity 15 min into their life cycle, stay intense as they grow larger, then gradually weaken after they have reached their maximum diameter. Two November case studies of severe convection are analysed in detail. A higher resolution grid length initiates convection slightly earlier (300 m as opposed to 1.5 km) with the same scientific settings. Two 1.5 km simulations that apply more subgrid mixing have delayed convective initiation. Analysis of soundings indicates little difference in the convective indices, suggesting that differences in convection may be attributed to the choice of subgrid mixing parameters. Abstract : Convective initiation is a challenge for convection‐permitting models due to its sensitivity to sub‐km processes. We evaluate the representation of convective storms and their initiation over South Africa during four summer months in Met Office Unified Model simulations. We find that the maximum number of modelled storm initiations occurs at least 2 hr prior to the radar‐observed maximum. Analysis of soundings indicates little difference in the convective indices, suggesting that differences in convection may be attributed to the choice of subgrid mixing parameters.