Variability of intended copies for etanercept (Enbrel®): Data on multiple batches of seven products. Issue 1 (2nd January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hassett, Brian; Scheinberg, Morton; Castañeda-Hernández, Gilberto; Li, Mengtao; Rao, Uppuluri R K; Singh, Ena; Mahgoub, Ehab; Coindreau, Javier; O'Brien, Julie; Vicik, Steven M; Fitzpatrick, Brian
• Is Part Of: MAbs. Volume 10:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 166
• Page End: 176
• Publication Date: 2018-01-02
• Subjects: biosimilar -- characterization -- comparability -- etanercept -- intended copy -- quality attribute; Monoclonal antibodies -- Therapeutic use -- Periodicals; Monoclonal antibodies -- Periodicals; Antibodies, Monoclonal -- Periodicals; 616.0798
• DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2017.1387346
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1942-0862

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Fusion protein and monoclonal antibody-based tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors represent established treatment options for a range of inflammatory diseases. Regulatory authorities have outlined the structural characterization and clinical assessments necessary to establish biosimilarity of a new biotherapeutic product with the innovator biologic drug. Biologic products that would not meet the minimum World Health Organization's standard for evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products are available in some countries; in some cases relevant data to assess biosimilarity and appropriate regulatory approval pathways are lacking. Batches of seven intended copy (IC) products for etanercept (Enbrel®) were subjected to a subset of test methods used in the routine release and heightened characterization of Enbrel®, to determine key attributes of identity, quality, purity, strength, and activity. While a number of quality attributes of the IC lots tested met the release specifications for Enbrel®, none fell within these limits across all methods performed, and there were no IC lots that satisfied the criteria typically applied by the innovator to support comparability with Enbrel®. Although the consequences of these differences are largely unknown, the potential for unanticipated clinical outcomes should not be overlooked.