A quantitative comparison of in-line coating thickness distributions obtained from a pharmaceutical tablet mixing process using discrete element method and terahertz pulsed imaging. (31st December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pei, Chunlei; Lin, Hungyen; Markl, Daniel; Shen, Yao-Chun; Zeitler, J. Axel; Elliott, James A.
• Is Part Of: Chemical engineering science. Volume 192(2018)
• Page Start: 34
• Page End: 45
• Publication Date: 2018-12-31
• Subjects: Terahertz in-line sensing -- Terahertz pulsed imaging -- Coating thickness variability -- Discrete element method -- Pharmaceutical coating; Chemical engineering -- Periodicals; Génie chimique -- Périodiques; Chemical engineering; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 660
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2018.06.045
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-2509

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: Terahertz in-line sensing of coating thickness is modelled by DEM/ray-tracing. Hit rates from simulations and experiments are in excellent agreement. The coating variability from in-line represents the intra-tablet variability. The statistics of in-line measurements can be corrected based on simulations. Abstract: The application of terahertz pulsed imaging (TPI) in an in-line configuration to monitor the coating thickness distribution of pharmaceutical tablets has the potential to improve the performance and quality of the spray coating process. In this study, an in-line TPI method is used to measure coating thickness distributions on pre-coated tablets during mixing in a rotating pan, and compared with results obtained numerically using the discrete element method (DEM) combined with a ray-tracing technique. The hit rates (i.e. the number of successful coating thickness measurements per minute) obtained from both terahertz in-line experiments and the DEM/ray-tracing simulations are in good agreement, and both increase with the number of baffles in the mixing pan. We demonstrate that the coating thickness variability as determined from the ray-traced data and the terahertz in-line measurements represents mainly the intra-tablet variability due to relatively uniform mean coating thickness across tablets. The mean coating thickness of the ray-traced data from the numerical simulations agrees well with the mean coating thickness as determined by the off-line TPI measurements. The mean coating thickness of in-line TPI measurements is slightly higher than that of the off-line measurements. This discrepancy can be corrected based on the cap-to-band surface area ratio of the tablet and the cap-to-band sampling ratio obtained from ray-tracing simulations: the corrected mean coating thickness of the in-line TPI measurements shows a better agreement with that of the off-line measurements.