Development and validation of an algorithm to assist in the interpretation of the electrocardiogram. (24th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pallikadavath, S; Watts, J; Gay, S; Sandilands, A
• Is Part Of: Europace. Volume 23:Supplement 3(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-05-24
• Subjects: Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Catheter ablation -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab116.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-5129

Abstract

Abstract: Funding Acknowledgements: Type of funding sources: None. Background and Purpose Interpretation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) is often poorly performed, affecting time critical patient care. There are no reliable methods that consistently bridge the gap between novices and competency. However, the development of a framework allowing a step-wise approach to interpret the ECG based on relevant signals might help. Indeed, in addition to expert teaching, a pilot study of this algorithm significantly improves sustained ECG interpretation in medical students. This study aimed to validate the ECG algorithm tool by confirming the appropriateness of its step-wise components through expert cardiologists. Methods: A Modified Delphi Exercise protocol was used. Cardiologists were invited to participate in a questionnaire through an online survey tool. Expert participants evaluated each stage of the ECG algorithm through multiple levels of agreement and explained their decision making with the option of free-text comments. These were collated and analysed by the four authors and changes subsequently made. The process was repeated, with evaluation of the changes from each round until a predetermined level of agreement was achieved. Results: This Modified Delphi Exercise produced two rounds. Overall, 55 responses from experts was achieved (first round = 33, round two = 22). The average agreement in round one was 85.8% with 25 changes from 124 comments. Round two achieved 93.4% agreement with 12 changes from 57 comments. After discussion by four authors, a consensus was reached and a final algorithm was achieved. Figure 1 shows the bradycardia section of the final algorithm (tachycardia and ST/T-wave/ischaemia sections not shown). Conclusions: We have validated an ECG algorithm through a rigorous development and review process in a multi-institutional and multi-national Modified Delphi study. The completed expert reviewed algorithm may be a safe, informative tool for novice users to improve ECG interpretation. However, further validation in user groups is now mandated to refine the tool.