Ultrasound-guided extra-cardiac vagal stimulation during cardioneuroablationa-a pilot feasibility study. (24th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Piotrowski, R; Zuk, A; Baran, J; Sikorska, A; Krynski, T; Kulakowski, P
• Is Part Of: Europace. Volume 23:Supplement 3(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-05-24
• Subjects: Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Catheter ablation -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab116.323
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-5129

Abstract

Abstract: Funding Acknowledgements: Type of funding sources: None. OnBehalf: N/A Background. Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a promising method for treatment of vagally-induced vasovagal syncope or functional atrio-ventricular block. Extra-cardiac vagal stimulation (ECVS) from the internal jugular vein is used during CNA to document asystolic response prior to CNA and lack of effects of vagal stimulation on heart rate after CNA. The recommended technique is placing the pacing catheter under fluoroscopy in the internal right and left jugular vein up to the level of the upper wisdom tooth. However, this technique has several limitations such as increased radiation exposure, unselective cranial nerves stimulation and lack of visualization of vagal nerve. Ultrasound-guided (USG) approach may be an interesting option because it allows visualization of the vagal nerve and enables selective stimulation under visual control. Purpose. To assess the utility of USG-guided ECVS during CNA procedures. Methods. The study group consisted of 6 patients (4 males, mean age 35 ± 12-year-old) underwent CNA. Firstly, electrode for ECVS was introduced under fluoroscopy into the right and left jugular veins up to the level of the upper wisdom tooth and ECVS was performed. Next, the USG-guided examinations were performed in supine position with head extension. The probe was placed in the transverse plane above the medial edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The course of vagal nerve was identified and place for imaging in the close neighborhood of the jugular vein was chosen. ECVS was performed when the electrode was in good contact with the vein wall and was in the vicinity of the vagal nerve. In both approaches vagal response (asystole and atrio-ventricular block) during ECVS was assessed before and after CNA. Results. In all patients ECVS was performed from both right and left jugular vein. Localization of vagal nerve using USG was possible in all patients and took less than one minute (see Figure). The effects of ECVS were identical using standard fluoroscopic and USG-guided approach. Conclusions. USG-guided ECVS during CNA is easy, results are comparable with standard fluoroscopic approach and is probably associated with less fluoroscopy. Since this non-invasive method is the only one which enables vagal nerve visualization, it should become a preferred approach when using ECVS during CNA procedures.