Long-term impact of transient atrioventricular block during atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia ablation. (24th May 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Long-term impact of transient atrioventricular block during atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia ablation. (24th May 2021)
- Main Title:
- Long-term impact of transient atrioventricular block during atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia ablation
- Authors:
- Marco Clement, I
Cossiani Martinez, M
Castrejon Castrejon, S
Alvarez Ortega, C
Martin Polo, L
Merino Argos, C
Tebar, D
Poveda, ID
Arbas, E
Caro Codon, J
Lopez-De-Sa, E
Peinado Peinado, R
Merino Llorens, JL - Abstract:
- Abstract: Funding Acknowledgements: Type of funding sources: None. Introduction: Ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is an extremely safe procedure, being complete atrioventricular (AV) block the most feared complication. Transient AV or ventriculoatrial (VA) block during ablation is considered a risk marker of immediate AV permanent block. Purpose: To study whether TB (transient block) during AVNRT ablation is associated with a higher risk of AV permanent block and pacemaker implantation during long term follow-up. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent ablation for AVNRT in our center and had a minimum five years follow-up. Patients carrying a cardiac pacing device were excluded. Data was extracted from electronic medical records and follow-up was performed by telephone contact. TB was defined as AV or VA loss of conduction of at least 1 beat during energy delivery. Results: We included 689 patients who underwent AVNRT ablation from March 1995 to December 2015: mean age 52.6 ± 18.6 years; 240 (34.8%) male; 677 radiofrequency and 12 cryotherapy ablations. TB was observed in 106 (15, 4%) patients. Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1. Within the TB group, 44 (41.5%) patients presented with AV block, 60 (56.6%) with VA block, and 2 patients presented with both. TB concerned more than one beat in 65 (61.9%) cases and persisted after cessation of energy delivery in 15 (14.2%) cases. Two patients did not recoverAbstract: Funding Acknowledgements: Type of funding sources: None. Introduction: Ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is an extremely safe procedure, being complete atrioventricular (AV) block the most feared complication. Transient AV or ventriculoatrial (VA) block during ablation is considered a risk marker of immediate AV permanent block. Purpose: To study whether TB (transient block) during AVNRT ablation is associated with a higher risk of AV permanent block and pacemaker implantation during long term follow-up. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent ablation for AVNRT in our center and had a minimum five years follow-up. Patients carrying a cardiac pacing device were excluded. Data was extracted from electronic medical records and follow-up was performed by telephone contact. TB was defined as AV or VA loss of conduction of at least 1 beat during energy delivery. Results: We included 689 patients who underwent AVNRT ablation from March 1995 to December 2015: mean age 52.6 ± 18.6 years; 240 (34.8%) male; 677 radiofrequency and 12 cryotherapy ablations. TB was observed in 106 (15, 4%) patients. Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1. Within the TB group, 44 (41.5%) patients presented with AV block, 60 (56.6%) with VA block, and 2 patients presented with both. TB concerned more than one beat in 65 (61.9%) cases and persisted after cessation of energy delivery in 15 (14.2%) cases. Two patients did not recover AV conduction, requiring pacemaker implantation before discharge. During a median 12.5 years follow-up (IQR 9.5-16.6), 3 of the remaining 104 TB patients required pacemaker implantation due to AV block. All 3 had presented AV TB and had undergone radiofrequency ablation; they were not significantly older (67.0 ± 9.3 vs 48.8 ± 19.8, p = 0.12) but presented longer basal PR (237.0 ± 115.2 vs 152.6 ± 26.5, p < 0.001) and HV (57.3 ± 6.7 vs 44.2 ± 7.6, p = 0.004) intervals. When compared to the non-TB group, there were no differences in pacemaker implantation due to AV block during follow-up (7 (1.2%) p = 0.19). However, median time to pacemaker implantation was shorter in TB patients than in non-TB: 0.7 [0.1-1.4] vs 13.7 [5.2-22.0], p = 0.02. Conclusion: Long term incidence of permanent AV block did not differ between TB and non-TB groups, however AV block occurred significantly earlier in TB patients. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Europace. Volume 23:Supplement 3(2021)
- Journal:
- Europace
- Issue:
- Volume 23:Supplement 3(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 23, Issue 3 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 23
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0023-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-05-24
- Subjects:
- Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals
Catheter ablation -- Periodicals
Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals
Electrophysiology -- Periodicals
617.4120645 - Journal URLs:
- http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/europace/euab116.303 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1099-5129
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.340450
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17092.xml