Divergence in Defence against Herbivores between Males and Females of Dioecious Plant Species. (23rd December 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Avila-Sakar, Germán; Romanow, Cora Anne
• Other Names: Marshall Jeremy L. Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: International journal of evolutionary biology. Volume 2012(2012)
• Publication Date: 2012-12-23
• Subjects: Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; Biological Evolution; Biological Phenomena; Evolution (Biology); Electronic journals; Periodical; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Periodicals; 576.805
• DOI: 10.1155/2012/897157
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2090-8032

Abstract

Abstract : Defensive traits may evolve differently between sexes in dioecious plant species. Our current understanding of this process hinges on a partial view of the evolution of resistance traits that may result in male-biased herbivory in dioecious populations. Here, we present a critical summary of the current state of the knowledge of herbivory in dioecious species and propose alternative evolutionary scenarios that have been neglected. These scenarios consider the potential evolutionary and functional determinants of sexual dimorphism in patterns of resource allocation to reproduction, growth, and defence. We review the evidence upon which two previous reviews of sex-biased herbivory have concluded that male-biased herbivory is a rule for dioecious species, and we caution readers about a series of shortcomings of many of these studies. Lastly, we propose a minimal standard protocol that should be followed in any studies that intend to elucidate the (co)evolution of interactions between dioecious plants and their herbivores.