Barriers and facilitators to knowledge translation activities within academic institutions in low- and middle-income countries. Issue 5 (1st March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kalbarczyk, Anna; Rodriguez, Daniela C; Mahendradhata, Yodi; Sarker, Malabika; Seme, Assefa; Majumdar, Piyusha; Akinyemi, Oluwaseun O; Kayembe, Patrick; Alonge, Olakunle O
• Is Part Of: Health policy and planning. Volume 36:Issue 5(2021)
• Page Start: 728
• Page End: 739
• Publication Date: 2021-03-01
• Subjects: Knowledge translation -- organizational readiness -- capacity building -- motivation; Medical policy -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; Public health -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; Health planning -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; 362.1091724
• DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa188
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0268-1080

Abstract

Abstract: The barriers and facilitators of conducting knowledge translation (KT) activities are well-established but less is known about the institutional forces that drive these barriers, particularly in low resource settings. Understanding organizational readiness has been used to assess and address such barriers but the employment of readiness assessments has largely been done in high-income countries. We conducted a qualitative study to describe the institutional needs and barriers in KT specific to academic institutions in low- and middle-income countries. We conducted a review of the grey and published literature to identify country health priorities and established barriers and facilitators for KT. Key-informant interviews (KII) were conducted to elicit perceptions of institutional readiness to conduct KT, including experiences with KT, and views on motivation and capacity building. Participants included representatives from academic institutions and Ministries of Health in six countries (Bangladesh, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Nigeria). We conducted 18 KIIs, 11 with members of academic institutions and 7 with policymakers. KIIs were analysed using a deductive and inductive coding approach. Our findings support many well-documented barriers including lack of time, skills and institutional support to conduct KT. Three additional institutional drivers emerged around soft skills and the complexity of the policy process, alignment of incentives and institutional missions, and the role of networks. Participants reflected on often-lacking soft-skills needed by researchers to engage policy makers. Continuous engagement was viewed as a challenge given competing demands for time (both researchers and policy makers) and lack of institutional incentives to conduct KT. Strong networks, both within the institution and between institutions, were described as important for conducting KT but difficult to establish and maintain. Attention to the cross-cutting themes representing barriers and facilitators for both individuals and institutions can inform the development of capacity building strategies that meet readiness needs.