Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC). Issue 12 (17th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lawson, Daeria O; Puljak, Livia; Pieper, Dawid; Schandelmaier, Stefan; Collins, Gary S; Brignardello-Petersen, Romina; Moher, David; Tugwell, Peter; Welch, Vivian A; Samaan, Zainab; Thombs, Brett D; Nørskov, Anders K; Jakobsen, Janus C; Allison, David B; Mayo-Wilson, Evan; Young, Taryn; Chan, An-Wen; Briel, Matthias; Guyatt, Gordon H; Thabane, Lehana; Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 10:Issue 12(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-12-17
• Subjects: statistics & research methods -- epidemiology -- education & training (see medical education & training); Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040478
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Methodological studies (ie, studies that evaluate the design, conduct, analysis or reporting of other studies in health research) address various facets of health research including, for instance, data collection techniques, differences in approaches to analyses, reporting quality, adherence to guidelines or publication bias. As a result, methodological studies can help to identify knowledge gaps in the methodology of health research and strategies for improvement in research practices. Differences in methodological study names and a lack of reporting guidance contribute to lack of comparability across studies and difficulties in identifying relevant previous methodological studies. This paper outlines the methods we will use to develop an evidence-based tool—the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist—to harmonise naming conventions and improve the reporting of methodological studies. Methods and analysis: We will search for methodological studies in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, check reference lists and contact experts in the field. We will extract and summarise data on the study names, design and reporting features of the included methodological studies. Consensus on study terms and recommended reporting items will be achieved via video conference meetings with a panel of experts including researchers who have published methodological studies. Ethics and dissemination: The consensus study has been exempt from ethics review by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board. The results of the review and the reporting guideline will be disseminated in stakeholder meetings, conferences, peer-reviewed publications, in requests to journal editors (to endorse or make the guideline a requirement for authors), and on the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network and reporting guideline websites. Registration: We have registered the development of the reporting guideline with the EQUATOR Network and publicly posted this project on the Open Science Framework (www.osf.io/9hgbq ).