Outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-high (≥50%) non–small cell lung cancer and a poor performance status. Issue 2 (4th August 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-high (≥50%) non–small cell lung cancer and a poor performance status. Issue 2 (4th August 2020)
- Main Title:
- Outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-high (≥50%) non–small cell lung cancer and a poor performance status
- Authors:
- Alessi, Joao V
Ricciuti, Biagio
Jiménez-Aguilar, Elizabeth
Hong, Fangxin
Wei, Zihan
Nishino, Mizuki
Plodkowski, Andrew J
Sawan, Peter
Luo, Jia
Rizvi, Hira
Carter, Brett W
Heymach, John V
Altan, Mehmet
Hellmann, Matthew
Awad, Mark - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) have been excluded from phase III immunotherapy clinical trials. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with advanced NSCLC, a PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%, and an ECOG PS of 2. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic NSCLC and a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% (negative for genomic alterations in EGFR and ALK ) who received treatment with first-line pembrolizumab. Clinical outcomes were compared in patients based on ECOG PS. Results: Among the 234 patients, 83.3% (n=195) had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and 16.7% (n=39) had an ECOG PS of 2. The baseline clinicopathological characteristics were balanced between the ECOG PS 0–1 vs 2 groups in terms of age, sex, tobacco use, histology, KRAS mutation status, presence of other potentially targetable driver mutations ( BRAF, MET, HER2, RET ), presence of brain metastases, and PD-L1 TPS distribution. Compared with patients with an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, patients with an ECOG PS of 2 had a significantly lower objective response rate (43.1% vs 25.6%; p=0.04), a numerically shorter median progression-free survival (6.6 months vs 4.0 months; HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.06); p=0.09), and a significantly shorter median overall survival (20.3 months vs 7.4 months; HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.68); p<0.001). On diseaseAbstract : Background: Patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) have been excluded from phase III immunotherapy clinical trials. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with advanced NSCLC, a PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%, and an ECOG PS of 2. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic NSCLC and a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% (negative for genomic alterations in EGFR and ALK ) who received treatment with first-line pembrolizumab. Clinical outcomes were compared in patients based on ECOG PS. Results: Among the 234 patients, 83.3% (n=195) had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and 16.7% (n=39) had an ECOG PS of 2. The baseline clinicopathological characteristics were balanced between the ECOG PS 0–1 vs 2 groups in terms of age, sex, tobacco use, histology, KRAS mutation status, presence of other potentially targetable driver mutations ( BRAF, MET, HER2, RET ), presence of brain metastases, and PD-L1 TPS distribution. Compared with patients with an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, patients with an ECOG PS of 2 had a significantly lower objective response rate (43.1% vs 25.6%; p=0.04), a numerically shorter median progression-free survival (6.6 months vs 4.0 months; HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.06); p=0.09), and a significantly shorter median overall survival (20.3 months vs 7.4 months; HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.68); p<0.001). On disease progression, patients with an ECOG PS of 2 were significantly less likely to receive second-line systemic therapy compared with patients with an ECOG PS of 0–1 (65% vs 22.2%, p=0.001). Conclusions: A subset of patients with NSCLC and an ECOG PS of 2 can respond to first-line pembrolizumab. However, clinical outcomes in this population are often poor and use of second-line systemic therapy is infrequent. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal for immunotherapy of cancer. Volume 8:Issue 2(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 8:Issue 2(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 2 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0008-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-08-04
- Subjects:
- Lung Neoplasms -- Tumor Biomarkers -- Immunotherapy
Cancer -- Immunotherapy -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Immunological aspects -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Immunological aspects -- Periodicals
Immunotherapy -- Periodicals
616.99406105 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.immunotherapyofcancer.org ↗
https://jitc.bmj.com/ ↗
http://link.springer.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/jitc-2020-001007 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2051-1426
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17014.xml