Improving the diagnosis of heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation. Issue 11 (10th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bunting, Karina V; Gill, Simrat K; Sitch, Alice; Mehta, Samir; O'Connor, Kieran; Lip, Gregory YH; Kirchhof, Paulus; Strauss, Victoria Y; Rahimi, Kazem; Camm, A John; Stanbury, Mary; Griffith, Michael; Townend, Jonathan N; Gkoutos, Georgios V; Karwath, Andreas; Steeds, Richard P; Kotecha, Dipak
• Is Part Of: Heart. Volume 107:Issue 11(2021)
• Page Start: 902
• Page End: 908
• Publication Date: 2021-03-10
• Subjects: atrial fibrillation -- echocardiography -- heart failure -- diastolic -- systolic; Heart -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318557
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1355-6037

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To improve the echocardiographic assessment of heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by comparing conventional averaging of consecutive beats with an index-beat approach, whereby measurements are taken after two cycles with similar R-R interval. Methods: Transthoracic echocardiography was performed using a standardised and blinded protocol in patients enrolled in the RATE-AF (RAte control Therapy Evaluation in permanent Atrial Fibrillation) randomised trial. We compared reproducibility of the index-beat and conventional consecutive-beat methods to calculate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS) and E/e' (mitral E wave max/average diastolic tissue Doppler velocity), and assessed intraoperator/interoperator variability, time efficiency and validity against natriuretic peptides. Results: 160 patients were included, 46% of whom were women, with a median age of 75 years (IQR 69–82) and a median heart rate of 100 beats per minute (IQR 86–112). The index-beat had the lowest within-beat coefficient of variation for LVEF (32%, vs 51% for 5 consecutive beats and 53% for 10 consecutive beats), GLS (26%, vs 43% and 42%) and E/e' (25%, vs 41% and 41%). Intraoperator (n=50) and interoperator (n=18) reproducibility were both superior for index-beats and this method was quicker to perform (p<0.001): 35.4 s to measure E/e' (95% CI 33.1 to 37.8) compared with 44.7 s for 5-beat (95% CI 41.8 to 47.5) and 98.1 s for 10-beat (95% CI 91.7 to 104.4) analyses. Using a single index-beat did not compromise the association of LVEF, GLS or E/e' with natriuretic peptide levels. Conclusions: Compared with averaging of multiple beats in patients with AF, the index-beat approach improves reproducibility and saves time without a negative impact on validity, potentially improving the diagnosis and classification of heart failure in patients with AF.