The Opioid Epidemic Was Not Caused by Economic Distress but by Factors That Could Be More Rapidly Addressed. Issue 1 (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Currie, Janet; Schwandt, Hannes
• Other Names: Smeeding Timothy M. guest-editor.; Romich Jenifer guest-editor.; Strain Michael R. guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Volume 695:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 276
• Page End: 291
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: opioids -- life expectancy -- prescription opioids -- labor markets; Social sciences -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- United States -- Periodicals; Political science -- Periodicals; United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals; 300
• DOI: 10.1177/00027162211033833
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-7162

Abstract

Without the opioid epidemic, American life expectancy would not have declined prior to 2020. The epidemic was sparked by the development and marketing of a new generation of prescription opioids, and the behavior of opioid providers is still helping to drive it. Little relationship exists between the opioid crisis and contemporaneous measures of labor market opportunity: cohorts and areas that experienced poor labor market conditions do show lagged increases in opioid mortality, but the effect is modest relative to the scale of the epidemic. We argue that specific policies and features of the U.S. health care market, especially liberal prescribing of opioids, led to the current crisis. It will not be possible to quickly reverse depressed economic conditions, but it is possible to implement policies that would reduce the number of new opioid addicts and save the lives of many who are already addicted.