Recurrent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: Incidence, Risk Factors, Revision Rates, and Outcomes at 2-Year Minimum Follow-up. Issue 1 (1st January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, Han Jo; Wang, Shan-Jin; Lafage, Renaud; Iyer, Sravisht; Shaffrey, Christopher; Mundis, Gregory; Hostin, Richard; Burton, Douglas; Ames, Christopher; Klineberg, Eric; Gupta, Munish; Smith, Justin; Schwab, Frank; Lafage, Virginie
• Is Part Of: Spine. Volume 45:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-01-01
• Subjects: C2-T3 sagittal vertical axis -- complications -- proximal junctional kyphosis -- recurrent proximal junctional kyphosis -- spine deformity -- spine revision -- thoracic pelvic angle; Spine -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals; Spine -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Spine -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.73005
• DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003202
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0362-2436

Abstract

Abstract : Study Design: Retrospective comparative cohort study. Objective: Assess the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of recurrent proximal junctional kyphosis (r-PJK) in PJK revision patients. Summary of Background Data: Several studies have identified the incidence and risk factors for PJK after primary surgery. However, few studies have reported on PJK recurrence after revision for PJK. Methods: A multicenter database of patients who underwent PJK revision surgery with minimum 2-year follow-up was analyzed. Demographic, operative, and radiographic outcomes were compared in patients with r-PJK and patients without recurrence no-Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (n-PJK). Postoperative Scoliosis Research Society-22r, Short Form-36, and Oswestry Disability Index were compared. Preoperative and most recent spinopelvic, cervical, and cervicothoracic radiographic parameters were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine r-PJK risk factors. A predictive model was formulated based on our logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 70 patients met the inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 21.8 months. The mean age was 66.3 ± 9.4 and 80% of patients were women. Before revision, patients had a proximal junctional angle angle of −31.7° ± 15.9°. The rate of recurrent PJK was 44.3%. Logistic regression showed that pre-revision thoracic pelvic angle (odds ratio [OR]: 1.060 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.002; 1.121; P = 0.042) and prerevision C2-T3 sagittal vertical axis (SVA; OR: 1.040 95% CI [1.007; 1.073] P = 0.016) were independent predictors of r-PJK. Classification with these parameters yielded an accuracy of 72.7%, precision of 80.6%, and recall of 73.5%. When examining correction, or change in alignment with revision surgery, we found that change in SVA (OR: 0.981 95% CI [0.968; 0.994] P = 0.005) was the only predictor of r-PJK with accuracy of 66.7%, precision of 74.2%, and recall of 69.7%. Conclusion: Patients after PJK revision surgery had a recurrence rate of 44%. Logistic regression based on the prerevision variables showed that prerevision thoracic pelvic angle and prerevision C2-T3 SVA were independent predictors of r-PJK. Level of Evidence: 4 Abstract : After revision for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), there is a recurrence rate of 44%. Prerevision thoracic pelvic angle and prerevision C2-T3 sagittal vertical axis are independent predictors of recurrent PJK. When revising patients with PJK, increased sagittal vertical axis correction is associated with an increased risk of recurrent PJK.