Multi-objective techno-economic-environmental optimisation of electric vehicle for energy services. (1st January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Das, Ridoy; Wang, Yue; Putrus, Ghanim; Kotter, Richard; Marzband, Mousa; Herteleer, Bert; Warmerdam, Jos
• Is Part Of: Applied energy. Volume 257(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-01-01
• Subjects: Multi-objective optimisation -- Electric vehicle -- Battery degradation -- Multi-criteria decision-making; Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Energy conservation -- Periodicals; Energy conversion -- Periodicals; 621.042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113965
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-2619

Abstract

Highlights: Optimisation of energy cost, battery degradation, grid utilisation and CO2 emission. The conflicts among objectives were addressed with multi-objective optimisation. A multi-criteria decision making process was tailored to the stakeholders. Frequency regulation provision was overall profitable for electric vehicle owners. The decision makers must cooperate to achieve societal benefits. Abstract: Electric vehicles and renewable energy sources are collectively being developed as a synergetic implementation for smart grids. In this context, smart charging of electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid technologies are seen as a way forward to achieve economic, technical and environmental benefits. The implementation of these technologies requires the cooperation of the end-electricity user, the electric vehicle owner, the system operator and policy makers. These stakeholders pursue different and sometime conflicting objectives. In this paper, the concept of multi-objective-techno-economic-environmental optimisation is proposed for scheduling electric vehicle charging/discharging. End user energy cost, battery degradation, grid interaction and CO2 emissions in the home micro-grid context are modelled and concurrently optimised for the first time while providing frequency regulation. The results from three case studies show that the proposed method reduces the energy cost, battery degradation, CO2 emissions and grid utilisation by 88.2%, 67%, 34% and 90% respectively, when compared to uncontrolled electric vehicle charging. Furthermore, with multiple optimal solutions, in order to achieve a 41.8% improvement in grid utilisation, the system operator needs to compensate the end electricity user and the electric vehicle owner for their incurred benefit loss of 27.34% and 9.7% respectively, to stimulate participation in energy services.