A deep‐learning model using automated performance metrics and clinical features to predict urinary continence recovery after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. (20th March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hung, Andrew J.; Chen, Jian; Ghodoussipour, Saum; Oh, Paul J.; Liu, Zequn; Nguyen, Jessica; Purushotham, Sanjay; Gill, Inderbir S.; Liu, Yan
• Is Part Of: BJU international. Volume 124:Number 3(2019)
• Page Start: 487
• Page End: 495
• Publication Date: 2019-03-20
• Subjects: robotic surgical procedures -- prostatectomy -- artificial intelligence -- urinary incontinence -- quality of life; Genitourinary organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Genitourinary organs -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Urology -- Periodicals; 616.6
• DOI: 10.1111/bju.14735
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1464-4096

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To predict urinary continence recovery after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using a deep learning (DL) model, which was then used to evaluate surgeon's historical patient outcomes. Subjects and Methods: Robotic surgical automated performance metrics (APMs) during RARP, and patient clinicopathological and continence data were captured prospectively from 100 contemporary RARPs. We used a DL model (DeepSurv) to predict postoperative urinary continence. Model features were ranked based on their importance in prediction. We stratified eight surgeons based on the five top‐ranked features. The top four surgeons were categorized in 'Group 1/APMs', while the remaining four were categorized in 'Group 2/APMs'. A separate historical cohort of RARPs (January 2015 to August 2016) performed by these two surgeon groups was then used for comparison. Concordance index (C‐index) and mean absolute error (MAE) were used to measure the model's prediction performance. Outcomes of historical cases were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis, chi‐squared and Fisher's exact tests. Results: Continence was attained in 79 patients (79%) after a median of 126 days. The DL model achieved a C‐index of 0.6 and an MAE of 85.9 in predicting continence. APMs were ranked higher by the model than clinicopathological features. In the historical cohort, patients in Group 1/APMs had superior rates of urinary continence at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (47.5 vs 36.7%, P = 0.034, and 68.3 vs 59.2%, P = 0.047, respectively). Conclusion: Using APMs and clinicopathological data, the DeepSurv DL model was able to predict continence after RARP. In this feasibility study, surgeons with more efficient APMs achieved higher continence rates at 3 and 6 months after RARP.