Testing for calibration systematics in the EDGES low-band data using Bayesian model selection. Issue 1 (5th December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sims, Peter H; Pober, Jonathan C
• Is Part Of: Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Volume 492:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 22
• Page End: 38
• Publication Date: 2019-12-05
• Subjects: radiation mechanisms: non-thermal -- methods: data analysis -- cosmology: observations -- dark ages, reionization, first stars -- radio continuum: general -- radio lines: ISM; Astronomy -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 520.5
• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3388
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0035-8711

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Cosmic Dawn (CD), when the first stars and proto-galaxies began to form, is commonly expected to be accompanied by an absorption signature at radio frequencies. This feature arises as Lyman α photons emitted by these first luminous objects couple the 21 cm excitation temperature of intergalactic hydrogen gas to its kinetic temperature, driving it into absorption relative to the cosmic microwave background. The detailed properties of this absorption profile encode powerful information about the physics of CD. Recently, Bowman et al. analysed data from the EDGES low-band radio antenna and found an unexpectedly deep absorption profile centred at 78 MHz, which could be a detection of this signature. Their specific analysis fit their measurements using a polynomial foreground model, a flattened Gaussian absorption profile, and a white noise model; we argue that a more accurate model, that includes a detailed noise model and accounting for the effects of plausible calibration errors, is essential for describing the EDGES data set. We perform a Bayesian evidence-based comparison of models of the EDGES low-band data set and find that those incorporating these additional components are decisively preferred. The subset of the best-fitting models of the data that include a global signal favours an amplitude consistent with standard cosmological assumptions ( A < 209 mK). However, there is not strong evidence to favour models of the data including a global 21 cm signal over those without one. Ultimately, we find that the derivation of robust constraints on astrophysics from the data is limited by the presence of systematics.