Improving detection of short-duration fishing behaviour in vessel tracks by feature engineering of training data. (2nd February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Farrell, Shay; Sanchirico, James N.; Chollett, Iliana; Cockrell, Marcy; Murawski, Steven A.; Watson, Jordan T.; Haynie, Alan; Strelcheck, Andrew; Perruso, Larry
• Editors: Eayrs, Stephen
• Is Part Of: ICES journal of marine science. Volume 74:Number 5(2017)
• Page Start: 1428
• Page End: 1436
• Publication Date: 2017-02-02
• Subjects: bandit reel -- electric reel -- fishing effort -- Gulf of Mexico -- machine learning -- pattern recognition -- random forest -- signal purity -- statistical learning -- supervised classification -- track segmentation -- vessel monitoring system -- VMS.; Ocean -- Periodicals; Fisheries -- Periodicals; Fishes -- Periodicals; Marine biology -- Bibliography -- Periodicals; 551.4605
• DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsw244
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1054-3139

Abstract

Abstract : Big data, such as vessel monitoring system (VMS) data, can provide valuable information on fishing behaviours. However, conventional methods of detecting behaviours in movement data are challenged when behaviours are briefer than signal resolution. We investigate options for improving detection accuracy for short-set fisheries using 581 648 position records from 181 vessels in the Gulf of Mexico bandit-reel fishery. We first investigate the effects of increasing VMS temporal resolution and find that detection accuracy improves with fishing-set duration. We then assess whether a feature engineering approach—in our case, changing the way pings are labelled when training a classifier—could improve detection accuracy. From a dataset of 12 184 observed sets, we find that the conventional point-labelling method results in only 49% of pings being correctly labelled as 'fishing', whereas a novel window-labelling method results in 88% of records being labelled as 'fishing'. When the labelled data are used to train classifiers, point labelling attains true-positive/balanced-accuracy rates of only 37%/66%, whereas window labelling achieves 68%/83%. Finally, we map fishing distribution using the two methods, and show that point labelling underestimates the extent of fishing grounds by ∼33%, highlighting the benefits of window labelling in particular, and feature engineering approaches in general.