Return-to-Play Outcomes in Elite Athletes After Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review. (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Leider, Joseph; Piche, Joshua David; Khan, Moin; Aleem, Ilyas
• Is Part Of: Sports health. Volume 13:Number 5(2021)
• Page Start: 437
• Page End: 445
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: spine -- surgery -- cervical -- elite athletes -- return to play -- ACDF -- foraminotomy -- cervical disc replacement; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Athletic Injuries -- Periodicals; Physical Education and Training -- Periodicals; Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena -- Periodicals; Médecine du sport -- Périodiques; 617.1027
• DOI: 10.1177/19417381211007813
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1941-7381

Abstract

Context: Return-to-play (RTP) outcomes in elite athletes after cervical spine surgery are currently unknown. Objective: To systematically review RTP outcomes in elite athletes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc replacement (CDR), or posterior foraminotomy (PF) surgery. Data Sources: EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, and Medline databases from inception until April 2020. Keywords included elite athletes, return to play, ACDF, foraminotomy, and cervical disc replacement . Study Selection: Eligible studies included those that reported RTP outcomes in elite athletes after cervical spine surgery. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Results: The primary outcomes of interest were rates and timing of RTP. Secondary outcomes included performance on RTP. A total of 1720 studies were initially screened. After inclusion criteria were applied, 13 studies with a total of 349 patients were included. A total of 262 (75%) played football, 37 (11%) played baseball, 19 (5%) played rugby, 10 (3%) played basketball, 10 (3%) played hockey, 9 (3%) were wresters, and 2 (1%) played soccer. ACDF was reported in 13 studies, PF in 3 studies, and CDR in 2 studies. The majority of studies suggest that RTP after surgical management is safe in elite athletes who are asymptomatic after their procedure and may lead to higher rates and earlier times of RTP. There is limited evidence regarding RTP or outcomes after CDR or multilevel surgery. Conclusion: The management and RTP in elite athletes after cervical spine injury is a highly complex and multifactorial topic. The overall evidence in this review suggests that RTP in asymptomatic athletes after both ACDF and PF is safe, and there is little evidence for decreased performance postoperatively. Surgical management results in a higher RTP rate compared with athletes managed conservatively.