Marketing to the foodshed: Why do farmers participate in local food systems?. (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schoolman, Ethan D.; Morton, Lois Wright; Arbuckle, J. Gordon; Han, Guang
• Is Part Of: Journal of rural studies. Volume 84(2021)
• Page Start: 240
• Page End: 253
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: Local food -- Embeddedness -- Civic values -- Environmental values -- Productivism -- Moral economy -- Short food supply chain; Sociology, Rural -- Periodicals; Country life -- Periodicals; Rural development -- Periodicals; Land use, Rural -- Planning -- Periodicals; Rural conditions -- Periodicals; Sociologie rurale -- Périodiques; Vie rurale -- Périodiques; Développement rural -- Périodiques; Sol, Utilisation agricole du -- Planification -- Périodiques; Conditions rurales -- Périodiques; Country life; Land use, Rural -- Planning; Rural conditions; Rural development; Sociology, Rural; Periodicals; 307.72
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.055
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0743-0167

Abstract

Abstract: The concept of embeddedness has long been central to theory about why farmers participate in local food systems. Yet few survey-based studies, and none using a representative sample of farmers who both do and do not market local food, have systematically examined the relationship of local food marketing to farmers' sense of connection to and responsibility for larger human and ecological communities. In this paper, we address this gap in the literature by drawing on stratified, random sample survey data on 698 specialty crop growers in Michigan and Ohio. Two main findings emerge from our study. First, farmers who prioritize civic engagement and community institutions were more likely to market food through CSA, direct-to-institution and farm-to-table partnerships, and intermediaries like food hubs. Many were also earning revenue from on-farm sales, farmers markets, and mainstream sources. Results of analysis clearly show, however, that it is CSA and intermediated local supply chains that hold special appeal for, or are particularly well suited to, farmers who make farm decisions with the larger community in mind. This finding suggests that diversified, robust local food systems may provide strong support for farmers who are especially committed to making a positive impact on local politics and civic life. Second, farmers with a relatively strong sense of environmental responsibility were generally not more likely to participate in local food systems. At a minimum, this finding lends credence to skepticism that local food farmers can be considered a priori more likely to adhere to organic, biodynamic, or other sustainable farming philosophies. At the same time, farmers who express a less productivist approach to farming were more likely to market local food in nearly every way. Productivism has historically been associated with heavy reliance on external inputs to manage pests and supply nutrients. Findings about productivism arguably constitute good reason to explore further the environmental aspects of local food systems, even in the absence of a clear relationship between environmental values and marketing local food. Highlights: Farmers' embeddedness values are related to whether they "market to the foodshed". "Civic embeddedness" is associated with CSA and intermediated local supply chains. "Ecological embeddedness" is not generally associated with marketing local food. Productivist values are inversely related to participation in local food markets.