Coupled microalgal–bacterial biofilm for enhanced wastewater treatment without energy investment. (June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Akao, Patricia K.; Singh, Bimalpreet; Kaur, Prabhdeep; Sor, Alessandra; Avni, Adi; Dhir, Amit; Verma, Shilpi; Kapoor, Shammi; Phutela, Urmila Gupta; Satpute, Sanjay; Sharma, Sandeep; Avisar, Dror; Sandha, Karmjit Singh; Mamane, Hadas
• Is Part Of: Journal of water process engineering. Volume 41(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-06
• Subjects: Wastewater treatment -- Microalgal–bacterial biofilm -- Sponge -- Rural area; Water-supply engineering -- Periodicals; Saline water conversion -- Periodicals; Seawater -- Distillation -- Periodicals; Sanitary engineering -- Periodicals; Sewage -- Purification -- Periodicals; 627
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102029
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2214-7144

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: Coupled microalgal–bacterial biofilm (CMBB) on sponges improved wastewater quality. Enriched biofilm on sponges was efficient without external energy for aeration. 8-fold COD reduction using CMBB with aeration and 4-fold using CMBB only. 4-day COD, BOD and phosphate removal using CMBB only was similar to aeration. COD and BOD after CMBB were below maximum allowed for crop irrigation. Abstract: In view of water-resource depletion, treated wastewater can serve as an alternative source for crop irrigation. However, conventional wastewater-treatment plants are energy-intensive and costly to construct and operate, especially for lower middle-income countries. The present study focused on improving the quality of wastewater by incorporating a coupled microalgal–bacterial biofilm (CMBB) treatment in wastewater ponds. Standard polyether sponges were dipped in raw wastewater samples to enhance biofilm development on them. The enriched sponges were used to treat wastewater, with or without external energy for aeration. Wastewater parameters were analyzed during the enrichment and treatment processes. The CMBB technology and aeration resulted in similar improvement of effluent quality, but the former saved on energy costs, and reduced total chemical oxygen demand (COD) by 36 % within 24 h and 71 % within 4 days; the values of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), ammonium and phosphates decreased by 80 %, 64 % and 95 %, respectively, within 7 days. The resultant COD and BOD values were below the maximum allowed for reuse and discharge.