Prospective observational study of gender and ethnicity biases in respiratory protective equipment for healthcare workers in the COVID-19 pandemic. Issue 5 (20th May 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Prospective observational study of gender and ethnicity biases in respiratory protective equipment for healthcare workers in the COVID-19 pandemic. Issue 5 (20th May 2021)
- Main Title:
- Prospective observational study of gender and ethnicity biases in respiratory protective equipment for healthcare workers in the COVID-19 pandemic
- Authors:
- Carvalho, Clarissa Y M
Schumacher, Jan
Greig, Paul Robert
Wong, Danny J N
El-Boghdadly, Kariem - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To describe success rates of respiratory protective equipment (RPE) fit testing and factors associated with achieving suitable fit. Design: Prospective observational study of RPE fit testing according to health and safety, and occupational health requirements. Setting: A large tertiary referral UK healthcare facility. Population: 1443 healthcare workers undergoing quantitative fit testing. Main outcome measures: Quantitative fit test success (pass/fail) and the count of tests each participant required before successful fit. Results: Healthcare workers were fit tested a median (IQR) 2 (1–3) times before successful fit was obtained. Males were tested a median 1 (1–2) times, while females were tested a median 2 (1–2) times before a successful fit was found. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Modelling each fit test as its own independent trial (n=2359) using multivariable logistic regression, male healthcare workers were significantly more likely to find a well-fitting respirator and achieve a successful fit on first attempt in comparison to females, after adjusting for other factors (adjusted OR=2.07, 95% CI): 1.66 to 2.60, p<0.001). Staff who described their ethnicity as White were also more likely to achieve a successful fit compared with staff who described their ethnicity as Asian (OR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.58, p<0.001), Black (OR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.71, p<0.001), mixed (OR=0.50 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.80, p=0.004) or otherAbstract : Objective: To describe success rates of respiratory protective equipment (RPE) fit testing and factors associated with achieving suitable fit. Design: Prospective observational study of RPE fit testing according to health and safety, and occupational health requirements. Setting: A large tertiary referral UK healthcare facility. Population: 1443 healthcare workers undergoing quantitative fit testing. Main outcome measures: Quantitative fit test success (pass/fail) and the count of tests each participant required before successful fit. Results: Healthcare workers were fit tested a median (IQR) 2 (1–3) times before successful fit was obtained. Males were tested a median 1 (1–2) times, while females were tested a median 2 (1–2) times before a successful fit was found. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Modelling each fit test as its own independent trial (n=2359) using multivariable logistic regression, male healthcare workers were significantly more likely to find a well-fitting respirator and achieve a successful fit on first attempt in comparison to females, after adjusting for other factors (adjusted OR=2.07, 95% CI): 1.66 to 2.60, p<0.001). Staff who described their ethnicity as White were also more likely to achieve a successful fit compared with staff who described their ethnicity as Asian (OR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.58, p<0.001), Black (OR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.71, p<0.001), mixed (OR=0.50 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.80, p=0.004) or other (OR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.99, p=0.043). Conclusions: Male and White ethnicity healthcare workers are more likely to achieve RPE fit test success. This has broad operational implications to healthcare services with a large female and Black, Asian and minority ethnic group population. Fit testing is imperative in ensuring RPE effectiveness in protecting healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 11:Issue 5(2021)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 11:Issue 5(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 11, Issue 5 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0011-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-05-20
- Subjects:
- COVID-19 -- health & safety -- occupational & industrial medicine -- adult intensive & critical care
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047716 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16839.xml