Mining Facebook data for Quality of Life assessment. Issue 6 (26th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Marengo, Davide; Azucar, Danny; Longobardi, Claudio; Settanni, Michele
• Is Part Of: Behaviour & information technology. Volume 40:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 597
• Page End: 607
• Publication Date: 2021-04-26
• Subjects: Quality of Life -- Facebook -- digital footprints -- data mining -- text-analysis -- LIWC; Electronic data processing -- Periodicals; Human engineering -- Periodicals; Information technology -- Periodicals; 303.4833
• DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1711454
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-929X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Research indicates that how individuals utilise language to express themselves reflects individual-level differences regarding psychosocial characteristics, including perceived Quality of Life (QoL). In this study, we apply a language modelling technique to the natural user-generated language from Facebook to examine associations between language expressed on Facebook and self-reported QoL. Specifically, we collected the user-generated language from a sample of 603 Facebook users (76.3% females), mined emerging text corpora using the LIWC closed-vocabulary approach, and examined associations between LIWC features and self-reported domain-specific QoL (Physical, Psychological, Social), and General QoL. In line with previous research, we found use of pronouns, negative emotions, death and sleep words, and use of profanity to be significantly associated with QoL. Next, we used the Random Forest algorithm to test the predictability of QoL dimensions based on LIWC features and posting activity statistics. The models achieved moderate predictive power ( r ranging from .22 to .33), the Psychological and General QoL dimensions showing the highest accuracy. An alternative approach combining LIWC features, posting activity, and predicted scores for domain-specific QoL components showed increased accuracy when predicting General QoL ( r = .43). Findings are discussed in light of previous literature. Suggestions for improving models in future studies are provided.