Comparison of a Hybrid IMRT/VMAT technique with non-coplanar VMAT and non-coplanar IMRT for unresectable olfactory neuroblastoma using the RayStation treatment planning system—EUD, NTCP and planning study. (12th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Raturi, Vijay P; Motegi, Atsushi; Zenda, Sadamoto; Nakamura, Naoki; Hojo, Hidehiro; Kageyama, Shin-Ichiro; Okumura, Masayuki; Rachi, Toshiya; Ohyoshi, Hajime; Tachibana, Hidenobu; Motegi, Kana; Ariji, Takaki; Nakamura, Masaki; Hirano, Yasuhiro; Hirata, Hidenari; Akimoto, Tetsuo
• Is Part Of: Journal of radiation research. Volume 62:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: 540
• Page End: 548
• Publication Date: 2021-04-12
• Subjects: olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) -- intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) -- volumetric-modulated radiotherapy (VMAT) -- normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) -- equivalent uniform dose (EUD); Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiobiology -- Periodicals; Radiation -- Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0449-3060

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (Hybrid IMRT/VMAT), with non-coplanar (nc) IMRT and nc-VMAT treatment plans for unresectable olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB). Hybrid IMRT/VMAT, nc-IMRT and nc-VMAT plans were optimized for 12 patients with modified Kadish C stage ONB. Dose prescription was 65 Gy in 26 fractions. Dose–volume histogram parameters, conformation number (CN), homogeneity index (HI), integral dose and monitor units (MUs) delivered per fraction were assessed. Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) based on the EUD model (NTCPLogit ) and the Lyman–Kutcher–Burman model (NTCPLKB ) were also evaluated. We found that the Hybrid IMRT/VMAT plan significantly improved the CN for clinical target volume (CTV) and planning treatment volume (PTV) compared with the nc-VMAT plan. In general, sparing of organs at risk (OARs) is similar with the three techniques, although the Hybrid IMRT/VMAT plan resulted in a significantly reduced Dmax to contralateral (C/L) optic nerve compared with the nc-IMRT plan. The Hybrid IMRT/VMAT plan significantly reduce EUD to the ipsilateral (I/L) and C/L optic nerve in comparison with the nc-IMRT plan and nc-VMAT plan, but the difference in NTCP between the three technique was <1%. We concluded that the Hybrid IMRT/VMAT technique can offer improvement in terms of target conformity and EUD for optic nerves, while achieving equal or better OAR sparing compared with nc-IMRT and nc-VMAT, and can be a viable radiation technique for treating unresectable ONB. However, the clinical benefit of these small differences in dosimetric data, EUD and NTCP of optic nerves may be minimal.