Management of Fever in Postpneumococcal Vaccine Era: Comparison of Management Practices by Pediatric Emergency Medicine and General Emergency Medicine Physicians. (1st June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Khine, Hnin; Goldman, David L.; Avner, Jeffrey R.
• Other Names: Chong Chee-Fah Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Emergency medicine international. Volume 2014(2014)
• Publication Date: 2014-06-01
• Subjects: Emergency medicine -- Periodicals; Medical emergencies -- Periodicals; 616.025
• DOI: 10.1155/2014/702053
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2090-2840

Abstract

Abstract : Background . The primary objective of this study was to compare management practices of general emergency physicians (GEMPs) and pediatric emergency medicine physicians (PEMPs) for well-appearing young febrile children. Methods . We retrospectively reviewed the charts of well-appearing febrile children aged 3–36 months who presented to a large urban children's hospital (PED), staffed by PEMPs, or a large urban general emergency department (GED), staffed by GEMPs. Demographics, immunization status, laboratory tests ordered, antibiotic usage, and final diagnoses were collected. Results . 224 cases from the PED and 237 cases from the GED were reviewed. Children seen by PEMPs had significantly less CXRs (23 (10.3%) versus 51 (21.5%), P = 0.001 ) and more rapid viral testing done (102 (45%) versus 40 (17%), P < 0.0001 ). A diagnosis of a viral infection was more common in the PED, while a diagnosis of bacterial infection (including otitis media) was more common in the GED. More GED patients were prescribed antibiotics (41% versus 27%, P = 0.002 ), while more PED patients were treated with oseltamivir (6.7% versus 0.4%, P < 0.001 ). Conclusions . Our findings identify important differences in the care of the young, well-appearing febrile child by PEMPs and GEMPs and highlight the need for standardization of care.