Prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after long-term Anti-PD-1 therapy (HOT1902). (June 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after long-term Anti-PD-1 therapy (HOT1902). (June 2021)
- Main Title:
- Prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after long-term Anti-PD-1 therapy (HOT1902)
- Authors:
- Ito, Shotaro
Asahina, Hajime
Honjo, Osamu
Tanaka, Hisashi
Honda, Ryoichi
Oizumi, Satoshi
Nakamura, Keiichi
Takamura, Kei
Hommura, Fumihiro
Kawai, Yasutaka
Ito, Kenichiro
Sukoh, Noriaki
Yokoo, Keiki
Morita, Ryo
Harada, Toshiyuki
Takashina, Taichi
Goda, Tomohiro
Dosaka-Akita, Hirotoshi
Isobe, Hiroshi - Abstract:
- Highlights: Data of 676 advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICI were analyzed. The efficacy and safety of long-term ICI treatment in the real world were studied. Rechallenge treatment of ICI was not effective in this study. Smoking and complete response were related to better PFS in the long-term treatment. Abstract: Objectives: Limited information is available on the appropriate treatment duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aimed to identify candidates who would benefit from ICI discontinuation after one year of treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods: This retrospective multi-institutional observational study examined medical records of all consecutive patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC, who started ICI monotherapy at 15 institutions in Japan between December 2015 and December 2017. Patients who received initial ICI therapy for >1 year without progressive disease were defined as the long-term treatment (LT) group; others were defined as the non-long-term treatment (NLT) group. Primary outcomes included the prognostic factors in the LT group, whereas secondary outcomes included efficacy of ICI rechallenge, safety, and survival outcomes in the overall population. Results: In total, 676 patients were enrolled, and 114 (16.9 %) were assigned to the LT group. The median time interval from the start of initial ICI administration to data cutoff was 34.3 months (range, 24.1–47.8); thus, all surviving patients wereHighlights: Data of 676 advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICI were analyzed. The efficacy and safety of long-term ICI treatment in the real world were studied. Rechallenge treatment of ICI was not effective in this study. Smoking and complete response were related to better PFS in the long-term treatment. Abstract: Objectives: Limited information is available on the appropriate treatment duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aimed to identify candidates who would benefit from ICI discontinuation after one year of treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods: This retrospective multi-institutional observational study examined medical records of all consecutive patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC, who started ICI monotherapy at 15 institutions in Japan between December 2015 and December 2017. Patients who received initial ICI therapy for >1 year without progressive disease were defined as the long-term treatment (LT) group; others were defined as the non-long-term treatment (NLT) group. Primary outcomes included the prognostic factors in the LT group, whereas secondary outcomes included efficacy of ICI rechallenge, safety, and survival outcomes in the overall population. Results: In total, 676 patients were enrolled, and 114 (16.9 %) were assigned to the LT group. The median time interval from the start of initial ICI administration to data cutoff was 34.3 months (range, 24.1–47.8); thus, all surviving patients were followed-up for at least 2 years from the start of initial ICI. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the LT than in the NLT group (33.6 months vs. 2.7 months; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, significantly better PFS was associated with smoking (hazard ratio [HR]=0.36, p = 0.04), and complete response (CR; HR=uncomputable, p < 0.001) in the LT group. Thirty-seven patients (5.5 %) received ICI rechallenge, including 10 in the LT group. Among patients receiving rechallenge treatment, the median PFS was 2.2 months, with no difference between the LT and NLT groups. Conclusions: In the LT group, smoking and achieving CR were significantly associated with better PFS. Since rechallenge treatment was not effective, careful consideration is required for discontinuing ICI. However, these prognostic factors are helpful in considering candidates for ICI discontinuation. Trial Registration: UMIN ID, UMIN000041403 … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lung cancer. Volume 156(2021)
- Journal:
- Lung cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 156(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 156, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 156
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0156-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- 12
- Page End:
- 19
- Publication Date:
- 2021-06
- Subjects:
- AE adverse events -- AEC absolute eosinophil count -- ALC absolute lymphocyte count -- ANC absolute neutrophil count -- CIs 95 % confidence intervals -- CR complete response -- ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status -- HRs hazard ratios -- ICIs immune checkpoint inhibitors -- irAEs immune-related AEs -- LT long-term treatment -- NLT non-long-term treatment -- NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer -- OS overall survival -- OSR overall survival of rechallenge treatment -- PD-1 programmed cell death protein-1 -- PD-L1 programmed death-ligand-1 -- PD progressive disease -- PFS progression-free survival -- PFSR progression-free survival of rechallenge treatment -- PR partial response -- RECIST 1.1 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1
Immune checkpoint inhibitor -- Pembrolizumab -- Nivolumab -- Non-small cell lung cancer -- ICI rechallenge
Lungs -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Lung Neoplasms -- Abstracts
Lung Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Poumons -- Cancer -- Périodiques
Lungs -- Cancer
Periodicals
Electronic journals
Electronic journals
616.99424 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01695002 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01695002 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01695002 ↗
http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/issues ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.04.011 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0169-5002
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5307.245000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16826.xml