A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Toward a cell‐free strategy. Issue 2 (15th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jiang, Sijing; Wang, Mohan; He, Jiacai
• Is Part Of: Bioengineering & translational medicine. Volume 6:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-12-15
• Subjects: acellular -- biomimetic -- bone regeneration -- scaffold -- functionalization; Bioengineering -- Periodicals; Drug development -- Periodicals; Drugs -- Testing -- Periodicals; 660.6
• DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10206
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2380-6761

Abstract

Abstract: In clinical terms, bone grafting currently involves the application of autogenous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic bone grafts, as well as natural or artificially synthesized materials, such as polymers, bioceramics, and other composites. Many of these are associated with limitations. The ideal scaffold for bone tissue engineering should provide mechanical support while promoting osteogenesis, osteoconduction, and even osteoinduction. There are various structural complications and engineering difficulties to be considered. Here, we describe the biomimetic possibilities of the modification of natural or synthetic materials through physical and chemical design to facilitate bone tissue repair. This review summarizes recent progresses in the strategies for constructing biomimetic scaffolds, including ion‐functionalized scaffolds, decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds, and micro‐ and nano‐scale biomimetic scaffold structures, as well as reactive scaffolds induced by physical factors, and other acellular scaffolds. The fabrication techniques for these scaffolds, along with current strategies in clinical bone repair, are described. The developments in each category are discussed in terms of the connection between the scaffold materials and tissue repair, as well as the interactions with endogenous cells. As the advances in bone tissue engineering move toward application in the clinical setting, the demonstration of the therapeutic efficacy of these novel scaffold designs is critical.