Effects of variable‐width jaw motion on beam characteristics for Radixact Synchrony®. Issue 5 (29th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ferris, William S.; Culberson, Wesley S.; Smilowitz, Jennifer B.; Bayouth, John E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. Volume 22:Issue 5(2021)
• Page Start: 175
• Page End: 181
• Publication Date: 2021-03-29
• Subjects: radixact -- synchrony -- tomotherapy; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Health Physics; Clinical Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13234
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-9914

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Radixact Synchrony corrects for target motion during treatment by adjusting the jaw and MLC positions in real time. As the jaws move off axis, Synchrony attempts to adjust for a loss in output due to the un‐flattened 6 MV beam by increasing the jaw aperture width. The purpose of this work was to assess the impact of the variable‐width aperture on delivered dose using measurements and simulations. Methods: Longitudinal beam profile measurements were acquired using an Edge diode with static gantry. Jaw‐offset peak, width, and integral factors were calculated for profiles with the jaws in the extreme positions using both variable‐width (Synchrony) and fixed‐width apertures. Treatment plans with target motion and compensation were compared to planned doses to study the impact of the variable aperture on volumetric dose. Results: The jaw offset peak factor (JOPF) for the Synchrony jaw settings were 0.964 and 0.983 for the 1.0‐ and 2.5‐cm jaw settings, respectively. These values decreased to 0.925 and 0.982 for the fixed‐width settings, indicating that the peak value of the profile would decrease by 7.5% compared to centered if the aperture width was held constant. The IMRT dose distributions reveal similar results, where gamma pass rates are above tolerance for the Synchrony jaw settings but fall significantly for the fixed‐width 1‐cm jaws. Conclusions: The variable‐width behavior of Synchrony jaws provides a larger output correction for the 1‐cm jaw setting. Without the variable‐aperture correction, plans with the 1‐cm jaw setting would underdose the target if the jaws spend a significant amount of time in the extreme positions. This work investigated the change in delivered dose with jaws in the extreme positions, therefore overall changes in dose due to offset jaws are expected to be less for composite treatment deliveries.