If fetuses are persons, abortion is a public health crisis. (2nd April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Blackshaw, Bruce; Rodger, Daniel
• Is Part Of: Bioethics. Volume 35:Number 5(2021)
• Page Start: 465
• Page End: 472
• Publication Date: 2021-04-02
• Subjects: abortion -- COVID‐19 -- moral status -- persons -- public health -- Thomson; Bioethics -- Periodicals; 174.957
• DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12874
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-9702

Abstract

Abstract: Pro‐life advocates commonly argue that fetuses have the moral status of persons, and an accompanying right to life, a view most pro‐choice advocates deny. A difficulty for this pro‐life position has been Judith Jarvis Thomson's violinist analogy, in which she argues that even if the fetus is a person, abortion is often permissible because a pregnant woman is not obliged to continue to offer her body as life support. Here, we outline the moral theories underlying public health ethics, and examine the COVID‐19 pandemic as an example of public health considerations overriding individual rights. We argue that if fetuses are regarded as persons, then abortion is of such prevalence in society that it also constitutes a significant public health crisis. We show that on public health considerations, we are justified in overriding individual rights to bodily autonomy by prohibiting abortion. We conclude that in a society that values public health, abortion can only be tolerated if fetuses are not regarded as persons.