Systematic review: An exploration of core componentry characterizing effective sustained nurse home visiting programs. (22nd January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Beatson, Ruth; Molloy, Carly; Perini, Nicholas; Harrop, Christopher; Goldfeld, Sharon
• Is Part Of: Journal of advanced nursing. Volume 77:Number 6(2021)
• Page Start: 2581
• Page End: 2594
• Publication Date: 2021-01-22
• Subjects: active ingredients -- adverse childhood experiences -- child health -- home visiting -- maternal health -- nurses -- parenting behaviour -- program componentry -- psychosocial development -- systematic review; Nursing -- Periodicals; 610.7305
• DOI: 10.1111/jan.14755
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0309-2402

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: To identify the core components or potential 'active ingredients' of sustained nurse home visiting (SNHV) programs that have demonstrated positive effects on maternal or child health, psychosocial development, or self‐sufficiency outcomes among disadvantaged families in high‐income countries. Design: S ystematic review with narrative summary. Data sources: Programs were identified from searches of several reputable evidence clearing houses and the following bibliographic databases: Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Year of publication was originally restricted from 2008 ‐2018, with additional searches conducted up to 2019. Review methods: This review of SNHV program componentry builds on a previous evaluation of program effectiveness. Programs were selected for inclusion if they had been tested in a randomized or cluster‐randomized controlled trial (RCT/CRCT). Componentry characteristics related to program delivery, nurse provider, and outcome‐specific intervention content were then extracted. Results: Comparison of the seven eligible programs showed seven common core components: antenatal commencement, support to child age 2 years, at least 19 scheduled visits and experienced or highly qualified nurses with program‐specific training, caseloads of approximately 25 families, regular supervision, and multidisciplinary supports. Outcome‐specific program content was generally not well reported. Conclusion: The findings from this review have utility in guiding the development of minimum standard benchmarks and best‐practice recommendations for SNHV programs and call for more detailed publication of core content componentry in the SNHV literature. Impact: Identification of the core componentry underpinning program effectiveness should inform policy decisions on program selection, adaptation for specific populations, and quality control. Such evidence‐based decision‐making should in turn lead to better maternal and child outcomes among disadvantaged families in high‐income countries, reducing societal and economic burdens of inequity.