A qualitative study of emergency department patients who survived an opioid overdose: Perspectives on treatment and unmet needs. (28th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hawk, Kathryn; Grau, Lauretta E.; Fiellin, David A.; Chawarski, Marek; O'Connor, Patrick G.; Cirillo, Nikolas; Breen, Chris; D'Onofrio, Gail
• Editors: Bird, Steven B.
• Is Part Of: Academic emergency medicine. Volume 28:Number 5(2021)
• Page Start: 542
• Page End: 552
• Publication Date: 2021-02-28
• Subjects: Emergency medicine -- Periodicals; 616.02505
• DOI: 10.1111/acem.14197
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1069-6563

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Emergency medicine clinicians are uniquely positioned to deliver interventions to enhance linkage to evidence‐based treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) in the acute overdose period, yet little is known about patient perspectives to effectively engage patients immediately following opioid overdose. Our objective was to explore patients' perspectives on substance use treatment, perceived needs, and contextual factors that shape the choice of patients seen in the emergency department (ED) to engage with treatment and other patient support services in the acute post–opioid overdose period. Methods: We administered a brief quantitative survey and conducted semistructured interviews with 24 adult ED patients receiving care after an acute opioid overdose between June 2016 and August 2017 in an urban, academic ED. We used constant comparison method and thematic analysis to identify themes across four levels of a modified social ecologic model (individual, interpersonal, organizational, and structural). Results: The mean (±SD) age of the sample was 33.5 (±9.33) years; 83% were White and 12% were Black; 67% were male; and 83% were diagnosed with OUD, with a mean (±SD) of 3.25 (±2.64) self‐reported lifetime opioid overdoses. Eight themes were identified as influencing participants' consideration of OUD treatment and other services: (1) perceptions about control of drug use, (2) personal experience with substance use treatment, (3) role of interpersonal relationships, (4) provider communication skills, (5) stigma, (6) availability of ED resources, (7) impact of treatment policies, and (8) support for unmet basic needs. Conclusions: Patients receiving ED care following overdose in our ED are willing to discuss their opioid use and its treatment in the ED and report a variety of unmet needs. This work supports a role for ED‐based research evaluating a patient‐oriented approach to engage patients after opioid overdose.