Effects of electromyography biofeedback for patients after knee surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (7th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xie, Yu-Jie; Wang, Shuang; Gong, Qun-Jie; Wang, Jian-Xiong; Sun, Fu-Hua; Miyamoto, Akira; Ou, Xia; Wang, Li; Wang, Shi-Qi; Zhang, Chi
• Is Part Of: Journal of biomechanics. Volume 120(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-05-07
• Subjects: Knee -- Orthopedic -- Electromyographic biofeedback -- Systematic review -- Meta-analysis; Animal mechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Mécanique animale -- Périodiques; Biomécanique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 571.4305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110386
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9290

Abstract

Abstract: There has been no systematic review evaluating the efficacy of electromyography (EMG) biofeedback after knee surgery recently. This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether EMG-biofeedback is effective for improving the range of motion (ROM), physical function, and pain relief in patients after knee. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of EMG-biofeedback after any knee surgery were retrieved from EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, ProQuest. This review identified 773 unique studies, and six RCTs were in the final meta-analysis. EMG-Biofeedback treatment has a significant difference compared to other rehabilitation therapy in knee ROM improving (SMD = −0.48, 95% CI = −0.82 to −0.14, p = 0.006, I 2 = 37%). Moreover, there was no significant difference in pain (SMD = −0.33, 95% CI = −0.67 to0.02, p = 0.07, I 2 = 41%) and physical function scores (MD = 1.83, 95% CI = −3.48 to7.14, p = 0.50, I 2 = 0%). The results illustrate that EMG-biofeedback can improve knee ROM in patients after knee surgery. However, it is not superior to other rehabilitation methods for pain relief and physical function improvement.