The association between patient experience and healthcare outcomes using SEER-CAHPS patient experience and outcomes among cancer survivors. Issue 4 (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mohan, Charan S.; Rotter, Jason S.; Tan, Hung-Jui; Kent, Erin; Bjurlin, Marc A.; Basch, Ethan; Samuel, Cleo; Nielsen, Matthew; Smith, Angela B.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geriatric oncology. Volume 12:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 623
• Page End: 631
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: CAHPS -- Medicare -- Patient experience -- Outcomes -- SEER -- Survey -- Cancer; Geriatric oncology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Aged -- Periodicals; Geriatric oncology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 618.976994005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.11.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1879-4068

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To understand the relationship between patient experience, as measured by scores on the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) survey, and clinical and financial outcomes among older cancer survivors. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the records of all Fee-for-Service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries 66 years and older who completed one CAHPS survey from 2001 to 2004 or 2007–2013 with one of the five following cancer types: breast, bladder, colorectal, lung, or prostate; and completed a CAHPS survey within 5 years of cancer diagnosis date. We conducted a multivariate analysis, controlling for clinical and demographic variables, to evaluate the association between excellent CAHPS scores and the following clinical and financial outcomes: mortality, emergency department visits, and total healthcare expenditures. Results: A total of 7395 individuals were present in our cohort, with 57% being male and 85.7% non-Hispanic White. Breakdown of the cohort by cancer site is as follows: prostate (40.4%), breast (28.6%), colorectal (14.0%), lung (9.4%), and bladder (7.6%). When looking at the relationship between CAHPS scores and clinical outcomes, there was no significant difference between excellent and non-excellent CAHPS score respondents in all three of the clinical outcomes studied. Furthermore, there was no association between ED utilization and patient experience scores when stratifying by cancer site and race/ethnicity among this cohort. Conclusion: In this cohort, a highly rated patient experience, as measured by responses on the CAHPS survey, is not associated with improved clinical outcomes among older cancer survivors.