Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. (May 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. (May 2021)
- Main Title:
- Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
- Authors:
- Merino, Paloma
Guinea, Jesús
Muñoz-Gallego, Irene
González-Donapetry, Patricia
Galán, Juan Carlos
Antona, Nerea
Cilla, Gustavo
Hernáez-Crespo, Silvia
Díaz-de Tuesta, José Luis
Gual-de Torrella, Ana
González-Romo, Fernando
Escribano, Pilar
Sánchez-Castellano, Miguel Ángel
Sota-Busselo, Mercedes
Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto
García, Julio
Cantón, Rafael
Muñoz, Patricia
Folgueira, María Dolores
Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel
Oteo-Iglesias, Jesús
Medrano, Sara
Pérez, Alba
Galar, Alicia
Martínez-Expósito, Oscar
Alejo-Cancho, Izaskun
Martín-Higuera, M. Carmen
Rolo, Marta
Estévez, M. Jesús
Bravo, Tania
Vicente, Diego
Montes, Mila
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: The standard RT-PCR assay for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is laborious and time-consuming, limiting testing availability. Rapid antigen-detection tests are faster and less expensive; however, the reliability of these tests must be validated before they can be used widely. The objective of this study was to determine the performance of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (PanbioRT) (Abbott) in detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Methods: This prospective multicentre study was carried out in ten Spanish university hospitals and included individuals with clinical symptoms or epidemiological criteria of COVID-19. Only individuals with ≤7 days from the onset of symptoms or from exposure to a confirmed case of COVID-19 were included. Two nasopharyngeal samples were taken to perform the PanbioRT as a point-of-care test and a diagnostic RT-PCR test. Results: Among the 958 patients studied, 325 (90.5%) had true-positive results. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the PanbioRT were 90.5% (95%CI 87.5–93.6) and 98.8% (95%CI 98–99.7), respectively. Sensitivity in participants who had a threshold cycle ( C T ) < 25 for the RT-PCR test was 99.5% (95%CI 98.4–100), and in participants with ≤5 days of the clinical course it was 91.8% (95%CI 88.8–94.8). Agreement between techniques was 95.7% (κ score 0.90; 95%CI 0.88–0.93). Conclusions: The PanbioRT performs well clinically, withAbstract: Objectives: The standard RT-PCR assay for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is laborious and time-consuming, limiting testing availability. Rapid antigen-detection tests are faster and less expensive; however, the reliability of these tests must be validated before they can be used widely. The objective of this study was to determine the performance of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (PanbioRT) (Abbott) in detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Methods: This prospective multicentre study was carried out in ten Spanish university hospitals and included individuals with clinical symptoms or epidemiological criteria of COVID-19. Only individuals with ≤7 days from the onset of symptoms or from exposure to a confirmed case of COVID-19 were included. Two nasopharyngeal samples were taken to perform the PanbioRT as a point-of-care test and a diagnostic RT-PCR test. Results: Among the 958 patients studied, 325 (90.5%) had true-positive results. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the PanbioRT were 90.5% (95%CI 87.5–93.6) and 98.8% (95%CI 98–99.7), respectively. Sensitivity in participants who had a threshold cycle ( C T ) < 25 for the RT-PCR test was 99.5% (95%CI 98.4–100), and in participants with ≤5 days of the clinical course it was 91.8% (95%CI 88.8–94.8). Agreement between techniques was 95.7% (κ score 0.90; 95%CI 0.88–0.93). Conclusions: The PanbioRT performs well clinically, with even more reliable results for patients with a shorter clinical course of the disease or a higher viral load. The results must be interpreted based on the local epidemiological context. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical microbiology and infection. Volume 27:Number 5(2021)
- Journal:
- Clinical microbiology and infection
- Issue:
- Volume 27:Number 5(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 27, Issue 5 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0027-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 758
- Page End:
- 761
- Publication Date:
- 2021-05
- Subjects:
- Antigen diagnosis -- Control of cases -- COVID-19 -- Multicentre evaluation -- Pandemic -- Quick diagnosis -- SARS-CoV2
Medical microbiology -- Periodicals
Diagnostic microbiology -- Periodicals
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
616.01 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1469-0691 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.001 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1198-743X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.305520
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16770.xml