"EMERGing" Electronic Health Record Data Metrics: Insights and Implications for Assessing Residents' Clinical Performance in Emergency Medicine. Issue 2 (9th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sebok‐Syer, Stefanie S.; Shepherd, Lisa; McConnell, Allison; Dukelow, Adam M.; Sedran, Robert; Lingard, Lorelei
• Editors: Chan, Teresa
• Is Part Of: AEM education and training. Volume 5:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-08-09
• Subjects: Emergency medicine -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; Emergency medicine -- Study and teaching -- United States -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.025
• DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10501
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2472-5390

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: Competency‐based medical education requires that residents are provided with frequent opportunities to demonstrate competence as well as receive effective feedback about their clinical performance. To meet this goal, we investigated how data collected by the electronic health record (EHR) might be used to assess emergency medicine (EM) residents' independent and interdependent clinical performance and how such information could be represented in an EM resident report card. Methods: Following constructivist grounded theory methodology, individual semistructured interviews were conducted in 2017 with 10 EM faculty and 11 EM residents across all 5 postgraduate years. In addition to open‐ended questions, participants were presented with an emerging list of EM practice metrics and asked to comment on how valuable each would be in assessing resident performance. Additionally, we asked participants the extent to which each metric captured independent or interdependent performance. Data collection and analysis were iterative; analysis employed constant comparative inductive methods. Results: Participants refined and eliminated metrics as well as added new metrics specific to the assessment of EM residents (e.g., time between signup and first orders). These clinical practice metrics based on data from our EHR database were organized along a spectrum of independent/interdependent performance. We conclude with discussions about the relationship among these metrics, issues in interpretation, and implications of using EHR for assessment purposes. Conclusions: Our findings document a systematic approach for developing EM resident assessments, based on EHR data, which incorporate the perspectives of both clinical faculty and residents. Our work has important implications for capturing residents' contributions to clinical performances and distinguishing between independent and interdependent metrics in collaborative workplace‐based settings.