A real‐world implementation of a nationwide, long‐term monitoring program to assess the impact of agrochemicals and agricultural practices on biodiversity. Issue 9 (4th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Andrade, Camila; Villers, Alexandre; Balent, Gérard; Bar‐Hen, Avner; Chadoeuf, Joël; Cylly, Daniel; Cluzeau, Daniel; Fried, Guillaume; Guillocheau, Sarah; Pillon, Olivier; Porcher, Emmanuelle; Tressou, Jessica; Yamada, Ohri; Lenne, Nicolas; Jullien, Jérôme; Monestiez, Pascal
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 11:Issue 9(2021)
• Page Start: 3771
• Page End: 3793
• Publication Date: 2021-03-04
• Subjects: agricultural practices -- farmland biodiversity -- monitoring program -- nontarget species; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6459
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

Abstract: Biodiversity has undergone a major decline throughout recent decades, particularly in farmland. Agricultural practices are recognized to be an important pressure on farmland biodiversity, and pesticides are suspected to be one of the main causes of this decline in biodiversity. As part of the national plan for reduction of pesticides use (Ecophyto), the French ministry of agriculture launched the 500 ENI (nonintended effects) monitoring program in 2012 in order to assess the unintended effects of agricultural practices, including pesticide use, on biodiversity represented by several taxonomic groups of interest for farmers. This long‐term program monitors the biodiversity of nontargeted species (earthworms, plants, coleoptera, and birds), together with a wide range of annual data on agricultural practices (crop rotation, soil tillage, weed control, fertilizers, chemical treatments, etc.). Other parameters (e.g., landscape and climatic characteristics) are also integrated as covariates during the analyses. This monitoring program is expected to improve our understanding of the relative contribution of the different drivers of population and community trends. Here, we present the experience of setting up the 500 ENI network for this ambitious and highly complex monitoring program, as well as the type of data it collects. The issue of data quality control and some first results are discussed. With the aim of being useful to readers who would like to set up similar monitoring schemes, we also address some questions that have arisen following the first five years of the implementation phase of the program. Abstract : We present a national monitoring program on biodiversity and agricultural practices, the 500 ENI monitoring program. Its objectives are to detect changes in biodiversity indicators and simultaneous changes in agricultural practices, including pesticide use. Such multi‐taxa long‐term monitoring at national scale, focused on both biodiversity and agricultural practices, has no equivalent in Europe.