Aspirin versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection (TREAT-CAD): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Issue 5 (May 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Aspirin versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection (TREAT-CAD): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Issue 5 (May 2021)
- Main Title:
- Aspirin versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection (TREAT-CAD): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial
- Authors:
- Engelter, Stefan T
Traenka, Christopher
Gensicke, Henrik
Schaedelin, Sabine A
Luft, Andreas R
Simonetti, Barbara Goeggel
Fischer, Urs
Michel, Patrik
Sirimarco, Gaia
Kägi, Georg
Vehoff, Jochen
Nedeltchev, Krassen
Kahles, Timo
Kellert, Lars
Rosenbaum, Sverre
von Rennenberg, Regina
Sztajzel, Roman
Leib, Stephen L
Jung, Simon
Gralla, Jan
Bruni, Nicole
Seiffge, David
Feil, Katharina
Polymeris, Alexandros A
Steiner, Levke
Hamann, Janne
Bonati, Leo H
Brehm, Alex
De Marchis, Gian Marco
Peters, Nils
Stippich, Christoph
Nolte, Christian H
Christensen, Hanne
Wegener, Susanne
Psychogios, Marios-Nikos
Arnold, Marcel
Lyrer, Philippe
Kahles, Timo
Nedeltchev, Krassen
Altersberger, Valerian
Bonati, Leo H
Brehm, Alex
Bruni, Nicole
De Marchis, Gian Marco
Engelter, Stefan T
Fabbro, Thomas
Fisch, Urs
Fladt, Joachim
Gensicke, Henrik
Hert, Lisa
Lyrer, Philippe A
Maurer, Marina
Peters, Nils
Polymeris, Alexandros
Psychogios, Marios-Nikos
Schaedelin, Sabine
Stippich, Christoph
Thilemann, Sebastian
Traenka, Christopher
Wagner, Benjamin
Arnold, Marcel
Fischer, Urs
Goeggel Simonetti, Barbara
Gralla, Jan
Heldner, Mirjam
Jung, Simon
Leib, Stephen L
Seiffge, David J
Mueller, Hubertus
Sveikata, Lukas
Sztajzel, Roman
Mueller, Hubertus
Correia, Pamela
Eskandari, Ashraf
Meyer, Ivo
Michel, Patrik
Nannoni, Stefania
Remillard, Suzette
Sirimarco, Gaia
Zachariadis, Alexandros
Kaegi, Georg
Mueller, Anna
Vehoff, Jochen
Hamann, Janne
Luft, Andreas R
Steiner, Levke
Wegener, Susanne
Erdur, Hebun J
Nolte, Christian H
von Rennenberg, Regina
Scheitz, Jan F
Feil, Katharina
Kellert, Lars
Christensen, Hanne
Rosenbaum, Sverre
… (more) - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: Cervical artery dissection is a major cause of stroke in young people (aged <50 years). Historically, clinicians have preferred using oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists for patients with cervical artery dissection, although some current guidelines—based on available evidence from mostly observational studies—suggest using aspirin. If proven to be non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists, aspirin might be preferable, due to its ease of use and lower cost. We aimed to test the non-inferiority of aspirin to vitamin K antagonists in patients with cervical artery dissection. Methods: We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial in ten stroke centres across Switzerland, Germany, and Denmark. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged older than 18 years who had symptomatic, MRI-verified, cervical artery dissection within 2 weeks before enrolment, to receive either aspirin 300 mg once daily or a vitamin K antagonist (phenprocoumon, acenocoumarol, or warfarin; target international normalised ratio [INR] 2·0–3·0) for 90 days. Randomisation was computer-generated using an interactive web response system, with stratification according to participating site. Independent imaging core laboratory adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation, but investigators, patients, and clinical event adjudicators were aware of treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of clinical outcomes (stroke, major haemorrhage, or death) andSummary: Background: Cervical artery dissection is a major cause of stroke in young people (aged <50 years). Historically, clinicians have preferred using oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists for patients with cervical artery dissection, although some current guidelines—based on available evidence from mostly observational studies—suggest using aspirin. If proven to be non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists, aspirin might be preferable, due to its ease of use and lower cost. We aimed to test the non-inferiority of aspirin to vitamin K antagonists in patients with cervical artery dissection. Methods: We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial in ten stroke centres across Switzerland, Germany, and Denmark. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged older than 18 years who had symptomatic, MRI-verified, cervical artery dissection within 2 weeks before enrolment, to receive either aspirin 300 mg once daily or a vitamin K antagonist (phenprocoumon, acenocoumarol, or warfarin; target international normalised ratio [INR] 2·0–3·0) for 90 days. Randomisation was computer-generated using an interactive web response system, with stratification according to participating site. Independent imaging core laboratory adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation, but investigators, patients, and clinical event adjudicators were aware of treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of clinical outcomes (stroke, major haemorrhage, or death) and MRI outcomes (new ischaemic or haemorrhagic brain lesions) in the per-protocol population, assessed at 14 days (clinical and MRI outcomes) and 90 days (clinical outcomes only) after commencing treatment. Non-inferiority of aspirin would be shown if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the absolute risk difference between groups was less than 12% (non-inferiority margin). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02046460 . Findings: Between Sept 11, 2013, and Dec 21, 2018, we enrolled 194 patients; 100 (52%) were assigned to the aspirin group and 94 (48%) were assigned to the vitamin K antagonist group. The per-protocol population included 173 patients; 91 (53%) in the aspirin group and 82 (47%) in the vitamin K antagonist group. The primary endpoint occurred in 21 (23%) of 91 patients in the aspirin group and in 12 (15%) of 82 patients in the vitamin K antagonist group (absolute difference 8% [95% CI −4 to 21], non-inferiority p=0·55). Thus, non-inferiority of aspirin was not shown. Seven patients (8%) in the aspirin group and none in the vitamin K antagonist group had ischaemic strokes. One patient (1%) in the vitamin K antagonist group and none in the aspirin group had major extracranial haemorrhage. There were no deaths. Subclinical MRI outcomes were recorded in 14 patients (15%) in the aspirin group and in 11 patients (13%) in the vitamin K antagonist group. There were 19 adverse events in the aspirin group, and 26 in the vitamin K antagonist group. Interpretation: Our findings did not show that aspirin was non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of cervical artery dissection. Funding: Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, Stroke Funds Basel, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Academic Society Basel. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lancet neurology. Volume 20:Issue 5(2021)
- Journal:
- Lancet neurology
- Issue:
- Volume 20:Issue 5(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 5 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0020-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 341
- Page End:
- 350
- Publication Date:
- 2021-05
- Subjects:
- Neurology -- Periodicals
Neurology -- Periodicals
Nervous System Diseases -- Periodicals
Neurologie -- Périodiques
Neurology
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.805 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14744422 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00044-2 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1474-4422
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5146.084000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16720.xml