Measuring and modelling crop water use of sweet pepper crops grown in screenhouses and greenhouses in an arid region. (December 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Measuring and modelling crop water use of sweet pepper crops grown in screenhouses and greenhouses in an arid region. (December 2020)
- Main Title:
- Measuring and modelling crop water use of sweet pepper crops grown in screenhouses and greenhouses in an arid region
- Authors:
- Hadad, Daniel
Lukyanov, Victor
Cohen, Shabtai
Zipilevitz, Ephraim
Gilad, Ziva
Silverman, David
Tanny, Josef - Abstract:
- Abstract : This research studied microclimate and evapotranspiration (ET) of pepper in high tunnel screenhouses and greenhouses. A study was carried out during three consecutive seasons, 2015–2016 (Season I), 2016–2017 (Season II) and 2017–2018 (Season III), in two high-tunnels. One was covered by a plastic sheet (greenhouse) and the other by a porous screen (17 mesh insect net; screenhouse). Other than the covers, the structures were identical. In both houses, microclimate variables were measured simultaneously above the canopy. Evapotranspiration was estimated using six different variations of the Penman–Monteith model. Plant transpiration was measured by the heat pulse technique. Measured transpiration was compared with model estimates of ET to identify the model in best agreement with measurements. Linear regressions between internal and external climatic conditions resulted in R 2 values between 0.003 (greenhouse temperature) and 0.99 (greenhouse global radiation). Generally, higher R 2 values were obtained for the screenhouse because internal microclimate interacted with the outside more than in the greenhouse. Mean daily evapotranspiration estimated by the six Penman–Monteith models tested was 1.61–4.23 and 1.42–4.43 mm day −1 for the greenhouse and screenhouse, respectively. Mean daily ratio between ET models and transpiration measurements varied between 0.81 and 2.01 with a mean value of 1.20 ± 0.34 (where ± is standard deviation). The comparison betweenAbstract : This research studied microclimate and evapotranspiration (ET) of pepper in high tunnel screenhouses and greenhouses. A study was carried out during three consecutive seasons, 2015–2016 (Season I), 2016–2017 (Season II) and 2017–2018 (Season III), in two high-tunnels. One was covered by a plastic sheet (greenhouse) and the other by a porous screen (17 mesh insect net; screenhouse). Other than the covers, the structures were identical. In both houses, microclimate variables were measured simultaneously above the canopy. Evapotranspiration was estimated using six different variations of the Penman–Monteith model. Plant transpiration was measured by the heat pulse technique. Measured transpiration was compared with model estimates of ET to identify the model in best agreement with measurements. Linear regressions between internal and external climatic conditions resulted in R 2 values between 0.003 (greenhouse temperature) and 0.99 (greenhouse global radiation). Generally, higher R 2 values were obtained for the screenhouse because internal microclimate interacted with the outside more than in the greenhouse. Mean daily evapotranspiration estimated by the six Penman–Monteith models tested was 1.61–4.23 and 1.42–4.43 mm day −1 for the greenhouse and screenhouse, respectively. Mean daily ratio between ET models and transpiration measurements varied between 0.81 and 2.01 with a mean value of 1.20 ± 0.34 (where ± is standard deviation). The comparison between transpiration measurements and the PM models showed that in most cases models based on internal climatic conditions were in better agreement with measurements than those based on the external conditions. Highlights: Pepper transpiration and microclimate were measured in high tunnels. Various models estimated ET in a greenhouse and a screenhouse. Screenhouse microclimate interacted with the outside more than the greenhouse did. Models using internal conditions were better than those using external climate. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Biosystems engineering. Volume 200(2020)
- Journal:
- Biosystems engineering
- Issue:
- Volume 200(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 200, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 200
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0200-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- 246
- Page End:
- 258
- Publication Date:
- 2020-12
- Subjects:
- Temperature -- Radiation -- Air velocity -- Evapotranspiration -- Sap flow -- Penman–Monteith
Bioengineering -- Periodicals
Agricultural engineering -- Periodicals
Biological systems -- Periodicals
Génie rural -- Périodiques
Systèmes biologiques -- Périodiques
631 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15375110 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.10.002 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1537-5110
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2089.670500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16725.xml