Deobfuscation, unpacking, and decoding of obfuscated malicious JavaScript for machine learning models detection performance improvement. Issue 3 (17th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ndichu, Samuel; Kim, Sangwook; Ozawa, Seiichi
• Is Part Of: CAAI transactions on intelligence technology. Volume 5:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 184
• Page End: 192
• Publication Date: 2020-07-17
• Subjects: invasive software -- Java -- Internet -- feature extraction -- text analysis -- vectors -- learning (artificial intelligence); formatted JS code -- deobfuscation methods -- unpacking -- DUD‐preprocessed obfuscated malicious JS codes -- term frequency–inverse document frequency model -- long short‐term memory model -- paragraph vector models -- obfuscated benign JS codes -- learned feature vectors -- FastText model -- JS code editor -- multilayer obfuscation -- original JS code -- undetectable code -- obscure code -- machine learning models detection; Artificial intelligence -- Periodicals; Computer science -- Periodicals; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 006.305
• DOI: 10.1049/trit.2020.0026
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2468-6557

Abstract

Abstract : Obfuscation is rampant in both benign and malicious JavaScript (JS) codes. It generates an obscure and undetectable code that hinders comprehension and analysis. Therefore, accurate detection of JS codes that masquerade as innocuous scripts is vital. The existing deobfuscation methods assume that a specific tool can recover an original JS code entirely. For a multi‐layer obfuscation, general tools realize a formatted JS code, but some sections remain encoded. For the detection of such codes, this study performs Deobfuscation, Unpacking, and Decoding (DUD‐preprocessing) by function redefinition using a Virtual Machine (VM), a JS code editor, and a python int_to_str() function to facilitate feature learning by the FastText model. The learned feature vectors are passed to a classifier model that judges the maliciousness of a JS code. In performance evaluation, the authors use the Hynek Petrak's dataset for obfuscated malicious JS codes and the SRILAB dataset and the Majestic Million service top 10, 000 websites for obfuscated benign JS codes. They then compare the performance to other models on the detection of DUD‐preprocessed obfuscated malicious JS codes. Their experimental results show that the proposed approach enhances feature learning and provides improved accuracy in the detection of obfuscated malicious JS codes.