How safe is safe enough? Psychological mechanisms underlying extreme safety demands for self-driving cars. (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shariff, Azim; Bonnefon, Jean-François; Rahwan, Iyad
• Is Part Of: Transportation research. Volume 126(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: Autonomous vehicles -- Automation -- Algorithm aversion -- Safety -- Illusory superiority; Transportation -- Periodicals; Transportation -- Technological innovations -- Periodicals; 388.011
• DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103069
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0968-090X

Abstract

Highlights: Psychological biases may lead to unrealistic safety requirements from autonomous vehicles. People require higher levels of safety when being driven by an AV than a human. People believe themselves to be safer drivers than they actually are. The safer people believe themselves to be, the more safety they require from AVs. Focusing on safety as the key benefit of AVs may backfire. Abstract: Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) promise of a multi-trillion-dollar industry that revolutionizes transportation safety and convenience depends as much on overcoming the psychological barriers to their widespread use as the technological and legal challenges. The first AV-related traffic fatalities have pushed manufacturers and regulators towards decisions about how mature AV technology should be before the cars are rolled out in large numbers. We discuss the psychological factors underlying the question of how safe AVs need to be to compel consumers away from relying on the abilities of human drivers. For consumers, how safe is safe enough? Three preregistered studies (N = 4566) reveal that the established psychological biases of algorithm aversion and the better-than-average effect leave consumers averse to adopting AVs unless the cars meet extremely potentially unrealistically high safety standards. Moreover, these biases prove stubbornly hard to overcome, and risk substantially delaying the adoption of life-saving autonomous driving technology. We end by proposing that, from a psychological perspective, the emphasis AV advocates have put on safety may be misplaced.