Latent Change Score Models for the Study of Development and Dynamics in Organizational Research. (October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Matusik, James Garrett; Hollenbeck, John R.; Mitchell, Rebecca L.
• Is Part Of: Organizational research methods. Volume 24:Number 4(2021)
• Page Start: 772
• Page End: 801
• Publication Date: 2021-10
• Subjects: longitudinal -- dynamics -- change -- latent change score -- dual change score; Organization -- Research -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Organizational sociology -- Research -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Management -- Research -- Methodology -- Periodicals; 302.350721
• DOI: 10.1177/1094428120963788
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1094-4281

Abstract

The empirical study of change has proven to be one of the most vexing challenges in organizational science. Fortunately, contemporary methodologies originating from developmental psychology may provide a potential solution and are consequently working their way into the literature. In particular, organizational researchers are increasingly employing variations of latent change score (LCS) models to address questions regarding change, development, and dynamics. Although these models may indeed be used to reliably study change, development, and dynamics, many studies utilizing these models—and published in premier outlets—are characterized by questionable methodological choices, improper modeling procedures, and suboptimal research designs. Thus, the purpose of the present article is to (a) provide a critical review of LCS models, (b) outline appropriate modeling procedures (with corresponding Mplus and R syntax), (c) compare and contrast LCS modeling with other analytical techniques, and (d) delineate best practices. Ultimately, we endorse the use of LCS models by organizational researchers interested in studying longitudinal phenomena. However, we also heed researchers to do so judiciously because their misuse may lead to their unwarranted rejection by the field.