Quality measures of a multicentre universal newborn hearing screening program in Malaysia. (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wong, Yun Ai; Mazlan, Rafidah; Abdul Wahab, Noor Alaudin; Ja'afar, Roslan; Huda Bani, Nurul; Abdullah, Nurul Ain
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical screening. Volume 28:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: 238
• Page End: 243
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: Universal newborn hearing screening -- public hospitals -- quality indicators -- Malaysia -- quality measurement; Medical screening -- Periodicals; 362.177
• DOI: 10.1177/0969141320973060
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0969-1413

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and discuss the outcomes of the universal newborn hearing screening program conducted at four public hospitals in Malaysia. Method: A retrospective analysis of the universal newborn hearing screening database from each hospital was performed. The database consisted of 28, 432 and 30, 340 screening results of babies born in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Quality indicators (coverage rate, referral rate, return for follow-up rate, and ages at screening and diagnosis) were calculated. Results: Overall coverage rate across the four hospitals was 75% in 2015 and 87.4% in 2016. Over the two years, the referral rates for the first screening ranged from 2.7% to 33.93% with only one hospital achieving the recommended benchmark of <4% in both years. The return for follow-up rates for each participating hospital was generally below the recommended benchmark of ≥95%. The mean age at screening was 3.9 ± 1.2 days and 3.3 ± 0.4 days, respectively. The mean age at diagnosis for 70 infants diagnosed with permanent hearing loss was 4.7 ± 0.7 months in 2015 and 3.6 ± 0.9 months in 2016. Conclusions: Quality measures for the universal newborn hearing screening program in four public hospitals in Malaysia were lower than the required standards. Nevertheless, some quality indicators showed statistically significant improvements over the two years. Next steps involve identifying and implementing the best practice strategies to improve the outcome measures and thus the quality of the program.