Prediction of coronary artery calcium scoring from surface electrocardiogram in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a pilot study. Issue 1 (23rd November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Farjo, Peter D; Yanamala, Naveena; Kagiyama, Nobuyuki; Patel, Heenaben B; Casaclang-Verzosa, Grace; Nezarat, Negin; Budoff, Matthew J; Sengupta, Partho P
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 1:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 51
• Page End: 61
• Publication Date: 2020-11-23
• Subjects: Calcium score -- Machine learning -- ECG -- Prediction; Medical informatics -- Periodicals; Medical technology -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Periodicals; 616.100284
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaa008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2634-3916

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring is an established tool for cardiovascular risk stratification. However, the lack of widespread availability and concerns about radiation exposure have limited the universal clinical utilization of CAC. In this study, we sought to explore whether machine learning (ML) approaches can aid cardiovascular risk stratification by predicting guideline recommended CAC score categories from clinical features and surface electrocardiograms. Methods and results: In this substudy of a prospective, multicentre trial, a total of 534 subjects referred for CAC scores and electrocardiographic data were split into 80% training and 20% testing sets. Two binary outcome ML logistic regression models were developed for prediction of CAC scores equal to 0 and ≥400. Both CAC = 0 and CAC ≥400 models yielded values for the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 84%, 92%, 70%, and 75%, and 87%, 91%, 75%, and 81%, respectively. We further tested the CAC ≥400 model to risk stratify a cohort of 87 subjects referred for invasive coronary angiography. Using an intermediate or higher pretest probability (≥15%) to predict CAC ≥400, the model predicted the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis ( P = 0.025), the need for revascularization ( P < 0.001), notably bypass surgery ( P = 0.021), and major adverse cardiovascular events ( P = 0.023) during a median follow-up period of 2 years. Conclusion: ML techniques can extract information from electrocardiographic data and clinical variables to predict CAC score categories and similarly risk-stratify patients with suspected coronary artery disease.