Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Issue 4 (23rd May 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Issue 4 (23rd May 2020)
- Main Title:
- Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Kamarajah, S K
Bundred, J R
Singh, P
Pasquali, S
Griffiths, E A - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Current evidence on the benefits of different anastomotic techniques (hand-sewn (HS), circular stapled (CS), triangulating stapled (TS) or linear stapled/semimechanical (LSSM) techniques) after oesophagectomy is conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence for the techniques for oesophagogastric anastomosis and their impact on perioperative outcomes. Methods: This was a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically for randomized and non-randomized studies reporting techniques for the oesophagogastric anastomosis. Network meta-analysis of postoperative anastomotic leaks and strictures was performed. Results: Of 4192 articles screened, 15 randomized and 22 non-randomized studies comprising 8618 patients were included. LSSM (odds ratio (OR) 0·50, 95 per cent c.i. 0·33 to 0·74; P = 0·001) and CS (OR 0·68, 0·48 to 0·95; P = 0·027) anastomoses were associated with lower anastomotic leak rates than HS anastomoses. LSSM anastomoses were associated with lower stricture rates than HS anastomoses (OR 0·32, 0·19 to 0·54; P < 0·001). Conclusion: LSSM anastomoses after oesophagectomy are superior with regard to anastomotic leak and stricture rates. Graphical Abstract: Stapled anastomoses were associated with lower anastomotic leak rates than hand-sewn anastomoses following oesophagectomy. Furthermore, linear stapled/semimechanical (LSSM) techniques were associated with lowerAbstract: Background: Current evidence on the benefits of different anastomotic techniques (hand-sewn (HS), circular stapled (CS), triangulating stapled (TS) or linear stapled/semimechanical (LSSM) techniques) after oesophagectomy is conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence for the techniques for oesophagogastric anastomosis and their impact on perioperative outcomes. Methods: This was a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically for randomized and non-randomized studies reporting techniques for the oesophagogastric anastomosis. Network meta-analysis of postoperative anastomotic leaks and strictures was performed. Results: Of 4192 articles screened, 15 randomized and 22 non-randomized studies comprising 8618 patients were included. LSSM (odds ratio (OR) 0·50, 95 per cent c.i. 0·33 to 0·74; P = 0·001) and CS (OR 0·68, 0·48 to 0·95; P = 0·027) anastomoses were associated with lower anastomotic leak rates than HS anastomoses. LSSM anastomoses were associated with lower stricture rates than HS anastomoses (OR 0·32, 0·19 to 0·54; P < 0·001). Conclusion: LSSM anastomoses after oesophagectomy are superior with regard to anastomotic leak and stricture rates. Graphical Abstract: Stapled anastomoses were associated with lower anastomotic leak rates than hand-sewn anastomoses following oesophagectomy. Furthermore, linear stapled/semimechanical (LSSM) techniques were associated with lower rates of anastomotic stricture than circular stapled or hand-sewn anastomoses. Current evidence therefore suggests superiority for the LSSM technique for oesophagogastric anastomosis. Linear stapler techniques superior … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BJS open. Volume 4:Issue 4(2020)
- Journal:
- BJS open
- Issue:
- Volume 4:Issue 4(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 4 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0004-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 563
- Page End:
- 576
- Publication Date:
- 2020-05-23
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/bjsopen ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bjs5.2017.1.issue-1/issuetoc ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs5.50298 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2474-9842
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16683.xml