Adaptive model predictive control for a dual-hormone artificial pancreas. (August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boiroux, Dimitri; Bátora, Vladimír; Hagdrup, Morten; Wendt, Sabrina Lyngbye; Poulsen, Niels Kjølstad; Madsen, Henrik; Jørgensen, John Bagterp
• Is Part Of: Journal of process control. Volume 68(2018)
• Page Start: 105
• Page End: 117
• Publication Date: 2018-08
• Subjects: Type 1 diabetes -- Artificial pancreas -- Insulin and glucagon -- Model predictive control -- Adaptive control; Process control -- Periodicals; Fabrication -- Contrôle -- Périodiques; Process control; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 660.281
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2018.05.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-1524

Abstract

Highlights: We design individualized closed-loop control algorithms for a dual-hormone artificial pancreas using insulin and glucagon. We compare model predictive control (MPC) algorithms based on different deterministic and stochastic models. We adjust the stochastic part of the MPC adaptively using a recursive extended least squares algorithm. Two asymmetric objective functions heavily penalize too low and too high blood glucose concentrations. We test our MPC algorithms on three virtual patients with circadian variations in metabolism. Abstract: We report the closed-loop performance of adaptive model predictive control (MPC) algorithms for a dual-hormone artificial pancreas (AP) intended for patients with type 1 diabetes. The dual-hormone AP measures the interstitial glucose concentration using a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and administers glucagon and rapid-acting insulin subcutaneously. The discrete-time transfer function models used in the insulin and glucagon MPCs comprise a deterministic part and a stochastic part. The deterministic part of the MPC model is individualized using patient-specific information and describes the glucose-insulin and glucose-glucagon dynamics. The stochastic part of the MPC model describes the uncertainties that are not included in the deterministic part of the MPC model. Using closed-loop simulation of the MPCs, we evaluate the performance obtained using the different deterministic and stochastic models for the MPC on three virtual patients. We simulate a scenario including meals and daily variations in the model parameters for two settings. In the first setting, we try five different models for the deterministic part of the MPC model and use a fixed model for the stochastic part of the MPC model. In the second setting, we use a second-order model for the deterministic part of the MPC model and estimate the stochastic part of the MPC model adaptively. The results show that the controller is robust to daily variations in the model parameters. The numerical results also suggest that the deterministic part of the MPC model does not play a major role in the closed-loop performance of MPC. This is ascribed to the availability of feedback and the poor prediction capability of the model, i.e. the large disturbances and model-patient mismatch. Moreover, a second order adaptive model for the stochastic part of the MPC model offers a marginally better performance in closed-loop, in particular if the model-patient mismatch is large.