Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies. (December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Beynel, Lysianne; Appelbaum, Lawrence G.; Luber, Bruce; Crowell, Courtney A.; Hilbig, Susan A.; Lim, Wesley; Nguyen, Duy; Chrapliwy, Nicolas A.; Davis, Simon W.; Cabeza, Roberto; Lisanby, Sarah H.; Deng, Zhi-De
• Is Part Of: Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. Volume 107(2019)
• Page Start: 47
• Page End: 58
• Publication Date: 2019-12
• Subjects: Online rTMS -- Cognition -- Meta-analysis; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Human behavior -- Periodicals; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Behavior -- Periodicals; Ethology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiologie -- Périodiques; Comportement humain -- Périodiques; Animaux -- Mœurs et comportement -- Périodiques; Neurologie -- Périodiques; Animal behavior; Human behavior; Neurology; Psychophysiology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 573.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.018
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0149-7634

Abstract

Highlights: Meta-analysis performed testing effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing. Active rTMS disrupted performance as measured by accuracy and reaction times. Function MRI targeting and short inter-trial intervals are associated with greater disruptive effects of rTMS. Abstract: Online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), applied while subjects are performing a task, is widely used to disrupt brain regions underlying cognition. However, online rTMS has also induced "paradoxical enhancement". Given the rapid proliferation of this approach, it is crucial to develop a better understanding of how online stimulation influences cognition, and the optimal parameters to achieve desired effects. To accomplish this goal, a quantitative meta-analysis was performed with random-effects models fitted to reaction time (RT) and accuracy data. The final dataset included 126 studies published between 1998 and 2016, with 244 total effects for reaction times, and 202 for accuracy. Meta-analytically, rTMS at 10 Hz and 20 Hz disrupted accuracy for attention, executive, language, memory, motor, and perception domains, while no effects were found with 1 Hz or 5 Hz. Stimulation applied at and 10 and 20 Hz slowed down RTs in attention and perception tasks. No performance enhancement was found. Meta-regression analysis showed that fMRI-guided targeting and short inter-trial intervals are associated with increased disruptive effects with rTMS.