Addressing bone quality and bone density after renal transplantation: A prospective evaluation of the evolution of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density over the first 5 years following renal transplantation in Asian patients. Issue 10 (16th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chandran, Manju; Hao, Ying; Kwee, Ann Kerwen; Swee, Du Soon; Ng, David Chee Eng; Kee, Terence Yi Shern; Bharadwaj, Pushan
• Is Part Of: Clinical transplantation. Volume 33:Issue 10(2019)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2019-08-16
• Subjects: Asian -- bone mineral density -- fracture -- kidney transplantation -- renal transplantation -- trabecular bone score; Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Periodicals; 617.95
• DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13671
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0902-0063

Abstract

Abstract: The evolution of trabecular bone score (TBS) and bone mineral density (BMD) over the first 5 years after renal transplantation was prospectively evaluated in 164 patients. Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were performed at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months. Cumulative steroid dose, serum 25(OH)D, calcium, parathyroid hormone, and total ALP levels at these time points were checked. Incident fractures were identified from X‐rays/vertebral fracture assessments. Mean (SD) age, TBS, and lumbar spine BMD at baseline were 47.11 (9.53), 1.424 (0.097), and 0.935 (0.183) gm/cm 2, respectively. Baseline TBS was lower in tertiary 1.38 (0.07) vs secondary hyperparathyroidism 1.43 (0.01) vs post‐parathyroidectomy 1.46 (0.11); P = .035. Trabecular bone score and BMD significantly decreased from baseline‐>6 months, changes after that at consecutive time points were non‐significant. 11% had incident fractures during the follow‐up period, majority being metatarsal with no vertebral or hip fractures noted. This first prospective evaluation of TBS and BMD evolution at multiple time points over 5 years suggest that microarchitectural and bone density deteriorations post‐renal transplantation stabilize after 6 months. Stabilization of these parameters could partially account for the absence of major fractures noted in this Asian population. Possible genetic and ethnic differences in fracture risk between Asian and Caucasian renal transplant patients have to be explored through large population‐based studies.