Continuous‐light versus pulsed‐light accelerated corneal crosslinking with ultraviolet‐A and riboflavin. Issue 3 (March 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Continuous‐light versus pulsed‐light accelerated corneal crosslinking with ultraviolet‐A and riboflavin. Issue 3 (March 2018)
- Main Title:
- Continuous‐light versus pulsed‐light accelerated corneal crosslinking with ultraviolet‐A and riboflavin
- Authors:
- Zhu, Yirui
Reinach, Peter S.
Zhu, Hanlei
Li, Ling
Yang, Fan
Qu, Jia
Chen, Wei - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: : To determine whether the pulsed‐light ultraviolet‐A (UVA) accelerated corneal crosslinking (CXL) procedure is more efficacious and selective than its continuous‐light counterpart in rabbits. Setting: : School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China. Design: : Experimental study. Methods: : Fifty‐four rabbits were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 had continuous‐light accelerated CXL using 9 mW/cm 2 UVA for 10 minutes (5.4 J/cm 2 ). Group 2 had pulsed‐light accelerated CXL by exposing them to 9 mW/cm 2 UVA for 20 minutes (1 second on/1 second off). Corneal stromal demarcation line depth, in vivo confocal microscopic analysis, biomechanical stiffness, endothelial cell density, and keratocyte apoptosis were measured after performing these CXL procedures. Results: : The mean stromal demarcation line depth was 254.7 μm ± 47.4 (SD) in Group 1 and 341.1 ± 36.1 μm in Group 2 ( P < .01). One day after CXL, confocal analysis and histological staining identified keratocyte apoptotic fragments in the anterior stroma in the Group 2 corneas whereas all cells were obliterated in Group1. Seven days after treatment, the thicknesses in Group 1 were significantly greater than those in Group 2 ( P < .05). Endothelial cell losses were reversible; however, in Group 1, some losses were still evident on day 7. Increases in both the stress–strain relationship and tangent modulus in Group 2 were greater than those in Group 1. Conclusion:Abstract : Purpose: : To determine whether the pulsed‐light ultraviolet‐A (UVA) accelerated corneal crosslinking (CXL) procedure is more efficacious and selective than its continuous‐light counterpart in rabbits. Setting: : School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China. Design: : Experimental study. Methods: : Fifty‐four rabbits were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 had continuous‐light accelerated CXL using 9 mW/cm 2 UVA for 10 minutes (5.4 J/cm 2 ). Group 2 had pulsed‐light accelerated CXL by exposing them to 9 mW/cm 2 UVA for 20 minutes (1 second on/1 second off). Corneal stromal demarcation line depth, in vivo confocal microscopic analysis, biomechanical stiffness, endothelial cell density, and keratocyte apoptosis were measured after performing these CXL procedures. Results: : The mean stromal demarcation line depth was 254.7 μm ± 47.4 (SD) in Group 1 and 341.1 ± 36.1 μm in Group 2 ( P < .01). One day after CXL, confocal analysis and histological staining identified keratocyte apoptotic fragments in the anterior stroma in the Group 2 corneas whereas all cells were obliterated in Group1. Seven days after treatment, the thicknesses in Group 1 were significantly greater than those in Group 2 ( P < .05). Endothelial cell losses were reversible; however, in Group 1, some losses were still evident on day 7. Increases in both the stress–strain relationship and tangent modulus in Group 2 were greater than those in Group 1. Conclusion: : The pulsed‐light accelerated CXL protocol was less injurious and more efficacious at inducing CXL than the continuous‐light accelerated CXL protocol in rabbit corneas. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. Volume 44:Issue 3(2018)
- Journal:
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 44:Issue 3(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 44, Issue 3 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0044-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2018-03
- Subjects:
- 617.7
- Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.12.028 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0886-3350
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.900000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16663.xml