Impact of baseline IOP, vacuum, and different docking mechanisms, and their interaction on IOP rise in femtosecond laser‐assisted refractive and cataract surgery. Issue 12 (December 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Impact of baseline IOP, vacuum, and different docking mechanisms, and their interaction on IOP rise in femtosecond laser‐assisted refractive and cataract surgery. Issue 12 (December 2019)
- Main Title:
- Impact of baseline IOP, vacuum, and different docking mechanisms, and their interaction on IOP rise in femtosecond laser‐assisted refractive and cataract surgery
- Authors:
- Mariacher, Siegfried
Laubichler, Peter
Mariacher, Martina
Wendelstein, Jascha
Fischinger, Isaak
Bolz, Matthias - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: : To study the intraocular pressure (IOP) variation during vacuum and docking of femtosecond laser application. Setting: : Department for Ophthalmology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria. Design: : Experimental study. Methods: : Intracameral intraocular pressure (IOP) was monitored in 30 porcine ex vivo models using a dual femtosecond laser platform (VICTUS). Five different baseline IOP levels (10 to 30 mm Hg) were assessed during fluid‐filled (liquid) docking, full‐contact (applanating) docking, and vacuum application without docking. Results: : Raising the baseline intracameral IOP from 10 to 30 mm Hg increased the IOP from 27.55 mm Hg ± 5.93 (SD) to 56.85 ± 6.10 mm Hg in the fluid‐filled docking group, and from 60.91 ± 8.41 mm Hg to 90.11 ± 6.64 mm Hg in the full‐contact docking group. The full‐contact docking procedure per se (excluding vacuum effect) increased the IOP by 61.7% (+36.58 ± 5.84 mm Hg). In contrast, fluid‐filled docking (excluding vacuum effect) raised the IOP by only 3.1% (+0.72 ± 2.71 mm Hg). Each 5 mm Hg reduction of baseline IOP resulted in a mean IOP reduction of 7.33 ± 3.05 mm Hg in the fluid‐filled group, and 7.30 ± 6.88 mm Hg in the full‐contact docking group ( P < .001). Decreasing baseline intracameral IOP from 15 to 10 mm Hg resulted in the highest IOP reduction between all subgroups ( P < .01). Conclusions: : Baseline IOP, docking procedures, and vacuum influenced IOP during femtosecondAbstract : Purpose: : To study the intraocular pressure (IOP) variation during vacuum and docking of femtosecond laser application. Setting: : Department for Ophthalmology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria. Design: : Experimental study. Methods: : Intracameral intraocular pressure (IOP) was monitored in 30 porcine ex vivo models using a dual femtosecond laser platform (VICTUS). Five different baseline IOP levels (10 to 30 mm Hg) were assessed during fluid‐filled (liquid) docking, full‐contact (applanating) docking, and vacuum application without docking. Results: : Raising the baseline intracameral IOP from 10 to 30 mm Hg increased the IOP from 27.55 mm Hg ± 5.93 (SD) to 56.85 ± 6.10 mm Hg in the fluid‐filled docking group, and from 60.91 ± 8.41 mm Hg to 90.11 ± 6.64 mm Hg in the full‐contact docking group. The full‐contact docking procedure per se (excluding vacuum effect) increased the IOP by 61.7% (+36.58 ± 5.84 mm Hg). In contrast, fluid‐filled docking (excluding vacuum effect) raised the IOP by only 3.1% (+0.72 ± 2.71 mm Hg). Each 5 mm Hg reduction of baseline IOP resulted in a mean IOP reduction of 7.33 ± 3.05 mm Hg in the fluid‐filled group, and 7.30 ± 6.88 mm Hg in the full‐contact docking group ( P < .001). Decreasing baseline intracameral IOP from 15 to 10 mm Hg resulted in the highest IOP reduction between all subgroups ( P < .01). Conclusions: : Baseline IOP, docking procedures, and vacuum influenced IOP during femtosecond laser application in a synergistic manner. Lowering the baseline intracameral IOP resulted in a significantly lower IOP during fluid‐filled docking for cataract surgery and full‐contact docking for refractive surgery. Full‐contact (applanating) docking resulted in a significantly higher IOP elevation compared with similar IOP values found during fluid‐filled (liquid) docking and the application of the suction ring alone without docking. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. Volume 45:Issue 12(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 45:Issue 12(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 45, Issue 12 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 45
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0045-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-12
- Subjects:
- 617.7
- Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.07.020 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0886-3350
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.900000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16622.xml