Effect of endocyclophotocoagulation on refractive outcomes in angle‐closure eyes after phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Issue 1 (January 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effect of endocyclophotocoagulation on refractive outcomes in angle‐closure eyes after phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Issue 1 (January 2016)
- Main Title:
- Effect of endocyclophotocoagulation on refractive outcomes in angle‐closure eyes after phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation
- Authors:
- Wang, Jay Ching‐Chieh
Campos‐Möller, Xavier
Shah, Manjool
Sheybani, Arsham
Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose : To compare postoperative refractive outcomes in angle‐closure eyes having phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with or without endocyclophotocoagulation (ECP). Setting : Single tertiary‐level ophthalmology practice. Design : Retrospective comparative study. Methods : Primary angle‐closure suspect (PACS), primary angle‐closure (PAC), or primary angle‐closure glaucoma (PACG) eyes that had phacoemulsification and IOL implantation with or without ECP from 2012 to 2014 were studied. Clinical data collected included axial length (AL), minimum and maximum keratometry (K) values, corneal powers, anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal white‐to‐white (WTW), implanted IOL power, and postoperative manifest refraction. The Holladay 1 formula was used for IOL calculations. Primary and secondary outcome measures were the mean absolute error (MAE) and mean arithmetic error, respectively. Results : Sixty‐eight eyes with ECP and 71 eyes without ECP were included. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in age, sex, eye side, ethnicity, AL, minimum or maximum keratometry values, ACD, WTW, or implanted IOL power. The MAE was lower in the non‐ECP group (0.47 ± 0.32D versus 0.62 ± 0.43D; P = .0285). The mean arithmetic error showed a more myopic result in the ECP group (−0.54 ± 0.53D versus −0.26 ± 0.52D; P = .0017). Conclusion : In this study, patients with PACS, PAC, or PACG having phacoemulsification and IOLAbstract : Purpose : To compare postoperative refractive outcomes in angle‐closure eyes having phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with or without endocyclophotocoagulation (ECP). Setting : Single tertiary‐level ophthalmology practice. Design : Retrospective comparative study. Methods : Primary angle‐closure suspect (PACS), primary angle‐closure (PAC), or primary angle‐closure glaucoma (PACG) eyes that had phacoemulsification and IOL implantation with or without ECP from 2012 to 2014 were studied. Clinical data collected included axial length (AL), minimum and maximum keratometry (K) values, corneal powers, anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal white‐to‐white (WTW), implanted IOL power, and postoperative manifest refraction. The Holladay 1 formula was used for IOL calculations. Primary and secondary outcome measures were the mean absolute error (MAE) and mean arithmetic error, respectively. Results : Sixty‐eight eyes with ECP and 71 eyes without ECP were included. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in age, sex, eye side, ethnicity, AL, minimum or maximum keratometry values, ACD, WTW, or implanted IOL power. The MAE was lower in the non‐ECP group (0.47 ± 0.32D versus 0.62 ± 0.43D; P = .0285). The mean arithmetic error showed a more myopic result in the ECP group (−0.54 ± 0.53D versus −0.26 ± 0.52D; P = .0017). Conclusion : In this study, patients with PACS, PAC, or PACG having phacoemulsification and IOL implantation with ECP had decreased predictability of the postoperative refraction and a small myopic shift compared with those without ECP. Financial Disclosure : Dr. Ahmed is a consultant to Alcon, Advanced Medical Optics, Bausch & Lomb, and Carl Zeiss. None of the other authors has a proprietary or financial interest in any material or method mentioned. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. Volume 42:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 42:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 42, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0042-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-01
- Subjects:
- 617.7
- Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.046 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0886-3350
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.900000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16627.xml