Long Live Monetary Gold *Terms and Conditions Apply. (26th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Paparinskis, Martins
• Is Part Of: AJIL unbound. Volume 115(2021)
• Page Start: 154
• Page End: 159
• Publication Date: 2021-04-26
• Subjects: International law -- Periodicals; 341.05
• DOI: 10.1017/aju.2021.14
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-7723

Abstract

Abstract : Zachary Mollengarden and Noam Zamir want to take back to basics the principle associated with the Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 ( Monetary Gold ) judgment of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Their "categorical" and mostly doctrinal claim, underpinned by policy concern about "the tensions between the bilateral presuppositions of the Statute and the increasingly multilateral nature of international affairs and international disputes" is "that the Monetary Gold principle is irreconcilable with the ICJ Statute's jurisdictional architecture." The tension between bilateralism and community interests often provides an attractive analytical perspective, and points raised by the authors might be relevant in calibrating certain aspects of the principle. But its wholesale critique, while skillfully put, is ultimately unpersuasive. Careful consideration of basic instruments and issues is commendable but an exclusive focus that does not engage with the broader international legal process will miss its unmistakable and widespread endorsement of the Monetary Gold principle. Even the concern about the multilateral context ultimately counts against rather than in favor of their argument. Multilateral sensitivities can already be articulated within the four corners of Monetary Gold, and Mauritius/Maldives, delivered just as the ink was drying on the first draft of this essay, is a perfectly timed example for that.